Yeah, but it's much more complex to use in my opinion. BCEL is very easy to use.
On Dec 31, 2007 8:36 PM, Dave Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more > actively developed/supported. > > asm.objectweb.org > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "uprime uprime812" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "BCEL Users List" <bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM > Subject: is BCEL a good choice? > > > > Hello again, > > > > I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code > > modification capability. I > > need a byte code engineering library with features like: > > > > * offer a reasonable set of utilities > > * not buggy > > * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly > > * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting > > enterpreneur > > :) > > > > Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > > > W.P. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ..::[ solarwind ]::.. http://www.ubuntu.com/
