On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 08:58:30PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Why not use the new in-kernel wifi stack? > > We do. The SoftMAC is an extension to it. > SoftMAC = Software Medium Access Control. It is about sending > and receiving management frames. > Some chips do this in hardware, so it is not part of the ieee80211 stack. > (the ipw2x00 do it in hardware, for example.)
Wouldn't it be better to try to get that functionality added into the net/ieee80211 code instead of maintaining separate extension outside the kernel tree? Many modern cards need the ability for the host CPU to take care of management frame sending and receiving and from my view point, this code should be in net/ieee80211. Many (all?) of the functions in this "SoftMAC" look like something that would be nice to have as an option in net/ieee80211. In other words, the low-level driver would indicate what kind of functionality it needs and ieee80211 stack would behave differently based on the underlying hardware profile. ipw2x00 happens to be one of the main users of net/ieee80211 at the moment, but it is by no means the only one and it should not be defining what kind of functionality ends up being included in net/ieee80211. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
