On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 20:04 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 18:57 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > Treating 0x900 as a chipcommon core appears to work - it reports the > > number of cores as 4, which doesn't seem ridiculous. Treating 0x820 as a > > PCI core "works" to the extent that firmware loads and the radio is > > switched on, but no interrupts are ever generated. > > Hey that's pretty cool. So all we need to figure out is how to route the > interrupts through the PCI-E core. I don't know this off the top of my > head but there's something about irq routing... will check.
This is what I had in mind: http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/BackPlane#head-e90722115f5b4e32df3bd7022182d9dbe8ed2baf johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
