Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:41:58PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> But this one is a 4312 no? It's getting confusing :) > > Yeah. I can't find any real reference to the 4312, so it's quite > possible that it's just a b/g version of the 4311.
Which would prove all the rumours wrong... Well, we don't have to tell anyone ;) johannes _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
