On Sunday 28 May 2006 18:22, Jason Lunz wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 05:48:33PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Oh, yes. That's really an interresting oops. > > I guess the interrupt, which is used for bcm, is used by another > > device, too. Is that right? Could you show us your /proc/interrupts > > please? > > In the "interrupt-shared" case it is indeed possible to deadlock. > > I will do an updated patch, which tries to solve this. > > hmm, i don't think so. This is from my UP kernel, but iirc it's the same > for the smp one:
Well, I would like to know it for sure. ;) Could you load the kernel which crashed and look there. It is quite important to know if it is caused by a shared IRQ or not. -- Greetings Michael. [2007: Knorkator (Germany) - 12 points] _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
