On Tuesday 11 July 2006 11:31, you wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:11:27 +0200 > Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But I think the following is also broken in the old code: > > A wq is not pending anymore, but just executing (before it reschedules > > itself). > > I think that would also loop forever. I don't think that's what we want. > > Because we can't really keep track of _this_. > > The present implementation assumes that the handler will re-arm itself. > > I agree that extending that makes sense. But beware that it's easy to > leave subtle holes in this logic. Needs careful thought to get right.
Yeah, as I said. There is still a race. Should I redo the patch to fix it? -- Greetings Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
