On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 11:47 +0200, Martin Langer wrote: > > -217b > > +218b
> Does the last bit of FFF belongs to G ? It would make more sense to me, > but then we need a new definition for G. Well, that doesn't make sense either because in the first two insns I quoted in binary it is: -0b10000101111011 +0b10000110001011 I think it's more likely that the last nibble of F belongs completely to something else or something... johannes _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
