Martin Langer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:51:08PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > > Sure. But there are more rev numbers in your logfiles. And there has to > be the revision of your wlan core 0x812, too. Look for a line like > > bcm43xx: Core 1: ID 0x812, rev 0x4, vendor 0x4243, disabled > ^^^^^^^ > > Which microcode will be loaded depends only on that revision number.
You're right. My numbers are bcm43xx: Core 0: ID 0x800, rev 0x2, vendor 0x4243, enabled bcm43xx: Core 1: ID 0x812, rev 0x4, vendor 0x4243, disabled bcm43xx: Core 2: ID 0x80d, rev 0x1, vendor 0x4243, enabled bcm43xx: Core 3: ID 0x807, rev 0x1, vendor 0x4243, disabled bcm43xx: Core 4: ID 0x804, rev 0x7, vendor 0x4243, enabled bcm43xx: Core 5: ID 0x812, rev 0x4, vendor 0x4243, disabled > >> The output of your new microcode version printout is Microcode rev >> 0x123, pl 0x21 (2005-01-22 19:48:06) > > Yeah, the patch seems to work like expected. That's good. Sure does. Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
