Johannes Berg wrote: > Would you actually need a fully refcounted enable/disable?
No, we could stick with our existing setup if the stack did something different. > Because for > the stack it wouldn't be required if it'd simply not start scanning when > queue is disabled and stop scanning immediately when queue stop is > requested. That would work, assuming there is a way to make the stack listen for the "TX queue stopped" event (or would the ieee80211_tx_disable wrapper take care of that?). Daniel _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
