On Friday 12 January 2007 18:54, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > > That's redundant. If it's not a PCI core, it must be a PCIE core. > > Not to be too blunt, but isn't that sort of sloppy logic? > Imho it's always better to check what something _is_ rather than what > something _isn't_. > The two are only semantically the same in a binary universe. (i.e., > PCI vs. PCI-E) > Of course that's the case right now, but the former logic is more > future-proof.
Heh, well, I see your point, but I don't think explicitely checking for PCI/E cores here does any good, because even if we specialcase the two core types it will break as soon as a new PCI-foobar core/bus is released. ;) So it's broken in either way. Maybe your way is less broken then mine, or not. But does that really matter, if it crashes in either way? hehe :) -- Greetings Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
