Fernando Toledo wrote: > Pavel Roskin escribió: > >> rate: iperf reports: > >> 1 928 Kbits/sec >> 2 1.69 Mbits/sec >> 5.5 3.92 Mbits/sec >> 6 4.78 Mbits/sec >> 9 6.55 Mbits/sec >> 11 5.97 Mbits/sec >> 12 8.18 Mbits/sec >> 18 10.4 Mbits/sec >> 24 13.0 Mbits/sec >> 36 15.1 Mbits/sec >> 48 187 Kbits/sec >> 54 N/A > testing at 11Mb i have same aprox. value that Pavel. > it was a REally_GOOD_news for me :)
My results are: rate 4311 rate 4318 rate ========================================= 11M 6.50 Mbs 6.34 Mbs 18M 10.4 Mbs 6.98 Mbs 24M 12.3 Mbs 7.61 Mbs 36M 15.0 Mbs 8.22 Mbs 48M 4.76 Mbs 8.05 Mbs 54M Failed 7.82 Mbs As can be seen, the 4311 does a little better at the lower rates; however, the 4318 persists all the way to 54M. We still have work left, but it is really encouraging to see the reports come in that the long-standing problems in associating are going away now that the interface is putting out more power. Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
