On Tuesday 06 March 2007 23:21, Larry Finger wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 22:53, Larry Finger wrote: > >> Michael Buesch wrote: > >>> Please make sure you are using the very last version of my tree. > >>> I committed some USBhost related fixes yesterday. > >>> If you are using latest tree, well, find out what's going on. :) > >>> I don't have the hardware to test this. > >>> > >> The only things in your tree this morning that I didn't have were the > >> correction to initb5, and the > >> change in tasklet killing. I will debug this problem as soon as I have the > >> time. > > > > Ok, thanks. > > I think we need a blacklist or better whitelist in the ohci driver > > to not drive devices with unconnected cores. But it shouldn't crash. > > At least not this way. :) > > I don't have a running device with usbcore right now (working on it), > > so I can't test that. > > I wish broadcom wouldn't have so many chips with dangling cores > > and other stuff around. > > If an 0x817 core really is a USB 1.1 HOST, we do need some way to detect that > we are dealing with a > PCI device and ignore the USB cores. Is there such a flag/indicator already > available?
Uhm, well. Yeah. For the first we could restrict it to embedded-only devices. And the rest, well. Probably there's some way to find out if the core works or not, too. I need to look through the register stuff again. But again, it shouldn't oops like yours at registering the hcd. That seems like a software bug. It may oops later with a buserror, sure. -- Greetings Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
