On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 01:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:17 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > With phy rev == 1, the gmode bit is assumed unset when initialising a
> > G PHY. Maybe that is the crucial difference. David will send me some
> > backtraces of this problem, once he does I'll look at it again.
> 
> http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211.dmesg-3.txt 
> 
> The module itself is at http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211.ko so
> you can find line numbers where they're not immediately obvious.

That was without Larry's latest patch applied. If I apply Larry's patch,
we get fewer machine checks...

http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211-lf.dmesg.txt 
http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211-lf.ko

Strange, I thought that when I'd tested Larry's patch I was left with
_no_ machine checks. Perhaps at that point I still had a printk on every
PHY read or write and the machine checks were lost in the noise.

-- 
dwmw2

_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to