Jiri Benc wrote: > > The whole signal reporting in WE looks like a mess to me. It seems that > no renaming could help here, I'm afraid - the names you consider better > others consider worse. > > Let's leave it as is, and return to it when converting mac80211 to use > cfg80211. With a bit of luck it would be no issue then :-)
I have already decided to leave the whole mess alone. I will patch bcm43xx-mac80211 to conform to what is currently in mac80211 so that reasonable values are seen by the users. Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
