Thanks for your response!

Well, I'm running Ubuntu 7.04 64-Bit version

- "uname -a" gives: Linux laptopandi 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 
19:00:28 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux

- "dmesg" offers no meaningful messages ([    2.262297] bcm43xx driver)

- iwconfig:  eth0
          IEEE 802.11b/g  ESSID:"aj2lta1"  Nickname:"Broadcom 4306"
          Mode:Managed  Frequency=2.472 GHz  Access Point: 
00:0F:66:D3:04:13  
          Bit Rate=24 Mb/s   Tx-Power=15 dBm  
          RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
          Link Quality=75/100  Signal level=-57 dBm  Noise level=-72 dBm
          Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:57  Rx invalid frag:0
          Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:0   Missed beacon:0

- iwlist eth0 scan:
          Cell 01 - Address: 00:0F:66:D3:04:13
                    ESSID:"aj2lta1"
                    Protocol:IEEE 802.11bg
                    Mode:Master
                    Channel:13
                    Encryption key:on
                    Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
                              11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s
                              48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
                    Quality=93/100  Signal level=-54 dBm  Noise 
level=-69 dBm
                    IE: WPA Version 1
                        Group Cipher : TKIP
                        Pairwise Ciphers (1) : TKIP
                        Authentication Suites (1) : PSK 
                    Extra: Last beacon: 40ms ago

I have to add that I am sitting just in front of the wireless router. 
The distance between router and notebook is at max half a meter. I find 
it also interesting, that iwlist and iwconfig show different quality 
percentages.

Kind regards,
Andreas

> Note: I am not a developer, just a user with different sleeping 
> habits, and so responded first.  Don't take the FIRST response as the 
> BEST response, just the first.
>
> First, the 4306 is an older car and certainly is well supported by the 
> bcm43xx code, much better so than the 4318.
>
> Second, the original bcm43xx code uses v.3 of the virmware.  Thew new 
> bcm43xx_mac80211 code (default in F7) uses v.4 of the firmware.
> The original works best in kernel 2.6.21-rc3 or better (other than 
> F7).  The new works best in the wireless-dev tree available via git.
>
> Lastly, there is a known POWER problem, which results in better 
> transmission if the transmission rates are reduced.
>
> Please include:
> 1.  root#  uname -a
> 2.  root#  dmesg | grep bcm
> 3.  root#  iwconfig
> and if you're not actually connected it sometimes helps to add
> 4.  root#  iwlist eth1 scan   (or iwlist wlan0 scan or whatever your 
> interface is called)
>
> I hope this information has helped rather than hurt,
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ehud Gavron
> Tucson AZ USA
> Toronto: Paul Tracy.  Silverstone: Lewis Hamilton:  Lime Rock: 
> McNish/Capello or Pirro/Werner  Daytone: JPM   IndyOvalDoodle: WTFC
>
> Andreas Peer wrote:
>> I don't know if this matters, but I have a Acer Ferrari 3400 
>> notebook, and according to the device list on the web site, the 
>> wireless chip should be the following:
>> - chip id: 4318
>> - product id: 0x4318
>> - subsystem vendor id: 0x1468
>> - subsystem product id 0x0312,
>> but instead lspci shows me that the notebook contains a chip with
>> - chip id: 4306
>> - product id: 0x4320
>> - subsystem vendor id: 0x185f
>> - subsystem product id 0x1220.
>> It is to original chip that was contained when I bought the notebook. 
>> Maybe the information on the device site is not accurate, or Acer put 
>> different chips inside their Ferrari 3400 notebooks?
>>
>> Another question: The driver works, but it has a much lower range 
>> than the Windows driver, i.e. I am not able to get a connection in 
>> places where on Windows I can connect with 36 MB/s and a good signal 
>> quality. Is this a known limitation? I think some time ago I read 
>> that bcm43xx uses firmware version 2.x, while the Windows drivers are 
>> already using version 3.x. Is that the problem, and is there a hope 
>> that the receiving quality will improve in the future?
>>
>> Last, but not least I want to say that i appreciate your work and I 
>> want to thank you for what you have than for the Open Source community!
>>
>> Andreas
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
>>   
>

_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to