On Wednesday 01 August 2007 20:54:47 Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 20:40:59 Larry Finger wrote:
> > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > 
> > > That's a known bug and I am currently trying to find out why it
> > > fails to tune the power to higher levels.
> > > Even adjusting power manually doesn't have any effect. So it's not
> > > a bug in the power scaling algorithm, but deeper in the attenuation 
> > > adjustment.
> > > Might be some broken table upload.
> > > 
> > 
> > It is something in the PHY initialization. I don't get sparking performance 
> > with a 4318 using the 
> > new port from softmac to mac80211, but I do get usable performance of at 
> > least 5 Mbs for all rates, 
> > even at 15-20 m from the AP. One thing is that the signal level from 
> > iwconfig is very low at -61 
> > dBm; whereas, the 4311 gives -37 at the same position relative to the AP. 
> > The noise values are both 
> > -72 dBm.
> 
> Sure, you are absolutely right. If I define has_hardware_pctl() to
> always be 0, I get better performance. So we somewhere blow up
> the hwpctl init. I'm debugging this at the moment.

No I don't. Hum.
But today I get rather good performance (well compared to yesterday)
from my tree. Seems to depend on the moonphase or something.

I hate benchmarking.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to