On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 13:37 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > If we just check the ack bit, rate control would throttle, just because > we sent unacked frames.
Ah but rate control shouldn't actually care about frames that we never expected an ACK for since there's no way to know for those anyway. So IMHO the rate control algorithm shouldn't even be called for those frames. > So if we didn't get an ack, we need to check if we failed, or if... > Oh, acutally. Why not simply check the noack bit in the tx_control... :) Works too, but it seems mac80211 should do that. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
