> I see. One thing I didn't like in quilt is that I have to > decide what I'm going to do before actually changing the > sources.
All I have to decide beforehand is the name of patch. In stgit this is the same. However, stg is worse, because there I even have to enter a description of what I'm about to do beforehand. *) Sometimes, I just make patches in quilt, then I do "quilt refresh", "quilt pop -a", "cd patches" and modify the patches and series file manually, e.g. by moving one patch from one file into the other. The "cd ..", "quilt push -a" and off I am. That the "database" of quilt is in a known format and I can hack on it with an editor is a plus for me :-) That said: once I'm finished with quilt-things, I'm using stg import to import this into git and use git to send it off to the mailing list. I'm not working with stg on the first place, because quilt is noticably faster than stg. *) in stgit I can do "stg refresh -e" to edit the description afterwards _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
