On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 22:26 +0200, Martin Langer wrote:

> > a0g0bsinitvalsN             ?
> > a0g0initvalsN               ?
> > a0g1bsinitvalsN             ?
> > a0g1initvalsN               ?
> > b0g0bsinitvalsN             ?
> > b0g0initvalsN               ?
> 
> Hmm, it sounds as cryptic as before. But I'm not living in the re 
> world ;)

Heh. Well, it's not too bad, I think I explained the scheme some time
ago. In any case, it makes it far easier for us to explain this area.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to