John W. Linville wrote: > > It is probably true that we haven't communicated this very well > outside the wireless team. We probably should have added bcm43xx to > the feature removal schedule before the 2.6.24 merge window closed. > > How about if we mark bcm43xx as "Obsolete" in MAINTAINERS and add > an entry to Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt with a "When" > of 2.6.26? I think that should give everyone sufficient notice...?
This sounds good to me. Of course, we all understand that once 2.6.25 is released, _EVERY_ complaint/bug report for bcm43xx and SoftMAC will get the response "switch to 2.6.25"! Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
