"John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:56:24AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Oh come on. b43 is more than a year old now. How long should we wait? >> > Two or three? Forever? >> >> possibly forever, if you dont get obvious regressions like "my wlan does >> not work" (reported in this very thread), resolved. Pushing the blame to >> udev (in a rather unfriendly way) wont give users a working system and >> wont get you many new testers for the new driver either. > > It is true that Michael can be a little unpleasant at times. > The colloquialism that comes to mind is that he "does not suffer fools > lightly". Hopefully he will take your counseling to heart and learn > to be a bit more moderate in his tone. FWIW, he is still young. :-)
No way. He's just inhuman. :P > That said, it is also true that the b43[legacy] driver[s] do a more > than adequate job of replacing the old bcm43xx driver provided that > one (re-)installs the proper firmware. And I know of no other driver > that goes to more trouble to tell you how to get the proper firmware > installed than this one. > > The bcm43xx driver will be added to the feature removal schedule > in 2.6.25. Proper judgment will be used in deciding the actual date > of its removal. In the meantime hopefully every distribution will > have or obtain a working udev configuration. If things don't work > out as planned then we will re-evaluate. > > Let's stop this now please. Agreed. As a b43legacy maintainer, I'd be happy to know if Ingo suggests other ways to smooth out the transition. I haven't read proposals yet. -- Ciao Stefano _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
