> > Yeah, me too. But the current iw syntax is just really confusing. :) > > I guess there's room for improving it. > > But the tool name "iw" is just fine, IMO. Less to type = better. > > Could we make it reference the wiphy instead of the wmaster? I still > hold-out some hope of making wmaster go away eventually...
Yes, that's the plan, there are even some stubs for that in the code. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
