On Friday 20 June 2008 11:50:29 Michael Buesch wrote:
> This is a rewrite of the DMA API for SSB devices.
> This is needed, because the old (non-existing) "API" made too many bad
> assumptions on the API of the host-bus (PCI).
> This introduces an almost complete SSB-DMA-API that maps to the lowlevel
> bus-API based on the bustype.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> John, please merge for 2.6.27
> This is one huge patch, because it's not really possible to split this
> without breaking bisect.
Note that this patch will slightly clash with another DMA update
that's going into linux-next.
This is trivial to resolve, however. wiggle will probably be able to
resolve most, if not all, of them.
> static bool b43_dma_mapping_error(struct b43_dmaring *ring,
> dma_addr_t addr,
> size_t buffersize, bool dma_to_device)
> {
> - if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(addr)))
> + if (unlikely(ssb_dma_mapping_error(ring->dev->dev, addr)))
> return 1;
These calls will clash. The patch in linux-next introduced an additional
dev parameter to dma_mapping_error.
The fix is obvious. Remove the clashing line and add the ssb_dma_mapping_error
call exactly as shown above.
> +static inline int ssb_dma_mapping_error(struct ssb_device *dev, dma_addr_t
> addr)
> +{
> + switch (dev->bus->bustype) {
> + case SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI:
> + return pci_dma_mapping_error(addr);
> + case SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB:
> + return dma_mapping_error(addr);
> + default:
> + __ssb_dma_not_implemented(dev);
> + }
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
The patch in linux-next will require a dev parameter to the lowlevel
functions. Simply do it this way:
pci_dma_mapping_error(dev->bus->host_pci, addr);
and
dma_mapping_error(dev->dev, addr);
--
Greetings Michael.
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
