[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The patch titled
> drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c: remove the switch in
> b43legacy_dma_init()
> has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
>
> drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init.patch
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c: remove the switch in
> b43legacy_dma_init()
> From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The gcc 3.4 fork used to compile the MN10300 port emits unwanted
> __ucmpdi2() calls for this switch on a 64bit value.
>
> Fix it by transforming the switch to equivalent "if ... else if ..."
> statements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN
> drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c~drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init
> drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
> ---
> a/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c~drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init
> +++ a/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
> @@ -1027,19 +1027,15 @@ int b43legacy_dma_init(struct b43legacy_
> enum b43legacy_dmatype type;
>
> dmamask = supported_dma_mask(dev);
> - switch (dmamask) {
> - default:
> - B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
> - case DMA_30BIT_MASK:
> +
> + if (dmamask == DMA_30BIT_MASK)
> type = B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
> - break;
> - case DMA_32BIT_MASK:
> + else if (dmamask == DMA_32BIT_MASK)
> type = B43legacy_DMA_32BIT;
> - break;
> - case DMA_64BIT_MASK:
> + else if (dmamask == DMA_64BIT_MASK)
> type = B43legacy_DMA_64BIT;
> - break;
> - }
> + else
> + B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
>
> err = ssb_dma_set_mask(dev->dev, dmamask);
> if (err) {
> _
Andrew,
When I received your E-mail, I wondered why there was not a similar
"fix" for b43. It was then I discovered how much b43 and b43legacy had
diverged while I wasn't looking. I have no objections to your patch;
however, I wonder if it might be better to fix b43legacy in the same
way that b43 was changed. I have prepared and tested such a fix (shown
below). The only problem with this is that the patch is much more
intrusive than Adrian's and there may be a problem getting it into
2.6.26 before it is released, but then I do not think that you intend to
send the -mm patch to 2.6.26.
What do you think is the best route to go?
Larry
=================================================
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
@@ -860,6 +860,18 @@ static u64 supported_dma_mask(struct b43
return DMA_30BIT_MASK;
}
+static enum b43legacy_dmatype dma_mask_to_engine_type(u64 dmamask)
+{
+ if (dmamask == DMA_30BIT_MASK)
+ return B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
+ if (dmamask == DMA_32BIT_MASK)
+ return B43legacy_DMA_32BIT;
+ if (dmamask == DMA_64BIT_MASK)
+ return B43legacy_DMA_64BIT;
+ B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
+ return B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
+}
+
/* Main initialization function. */
static
struct b43legacy_dmaring *b43legacy_setup_dmaring(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev,
@@ -1019,6 +1031,43 @@ void b43legacy_dma_free(struct b43legacy
dma->tx_ring0 = NULL;
}
+static int b43legacy_dma_set_mask(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev, u64 mask)
+{
+ u64 orig_mask = mask;
+ bool fallback = 0;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Try to set the DMA mask. If it fails, try falling back to a
+ * lower mask, as we can always also support a lower one. */
+ while (1) {
+ err = ssb_dma_set_mask(dev->dev, mask);
+ if (!err)
+ break;
+ if (mask == DMA_64BIT_MASK) {
+ mask = DMA_32BIT_MASK;
+ fallback = 1;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (mask == DMA_32BIT_MASK) {
+ mask = DMA_30BIT_MASK;
+ fallback = 1;
+ continue;
+ }
+ b43legacyerr(dev->wl, "The machine/kernel does not support "
+ "the required %u-bit DMA mask\n",
+ (unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(orig_mask));
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+ if (fallback) {
+ b43legacyinfo(dev->wl, "DMA mask fallback from %u-bit to %u-"
+ "bit\n",
+ (unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(orig_mask),
+ (unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(mask));
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int b43legacy_dma_init(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev)
{
struct b43legacy_dma *dma = &dev->dma;
@@ -1028,21 +1077,8 @@ int b43legacy_dma_init(struct b43legacy_
enum b43legacy_dmatype type;
dmamask = supported_dma_mask(dev);
- switch (dmamask) {
- default:
- B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
- case DMA_30BIT_MASK:
- type = B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
- break;
- case DMA_32BIT_MASK:
- type = B43legacy_DMA_32BIT;
- break;
- case DMA_64BIT_MASK:
- type = B43legacy_DMA_64BIT;
- break;
- }
-
- err = ssb_dma_set_mask(dev->dev, dmamask);
+ type = dma_mask_to_engine_type(dmamask);
+ err = b43legacy_dma_set_mask(dev, dmamask);
if (err) {
#ifdef CONFIG_B43LEGACY_PIO
b43legacywarn(dev->wl, "DMA for this device not supported. "
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
