Is this close?
E
--- /tmp/phy_g.c 2008-09-05 21:06:57.000000000 -0700
+++ phy_g.c 2008-09-05 21:36:18.000000000 -0700
@@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@
else
b43_phy_initb6(dev);
- if (phy->rev >= 2 || phy->gmode)
+ if (phy->rev >= 2 && phy->gmode)
b43_phy_inita(dev);
if (phy->rev >= 2) {
@@ -2216,9 +2216,9 @@
if (phy->gmode || phy->rev >= 2) {
tmp = b43_phy_read(dev, B43_PHY_VERSION_OFDM);
tmp &= B43_PHYVER_VERSION;
- if (tmp == 3 || tmp == 5) {
+ if (tmp == 4 || tmp == 5) {
b43_phy_write(dev, B43_PHY_OFDM(0xC2), 0x1816);
- b43_phy_write(dev, B43_PHY_OFDM(0xC3), 0x8006);
+ b43_phy_write(dev, B43_PHY_OFDM(0xC3), 0x8606);
}
if (tmp == 5) {
b43_phy_write(dev, B43_PHY_OFDM(0xCC),
@@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@
& 0x00FF) | 0x1F00);
}
}
- if ((phy->rev <= 2 && phy->gmode) || phy->rev >= 2)
+ if ((phy->rev >=2)
b43_phy_write(dev, B43_PHY_OFDM(0x7E), 0x78);
if (phy->radio_rev == 8) {
b43_phy_write(dev, B43_PHY_EXTG(0x01),
Larry Finger wrote:
> I recently found some places where the G-PHY initialization
> specifications were wrong. I updated the relevant parts of the V3
> specifications at http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net - the pages for
> GPHY, B6PHY and B5PHY were changed.
>
> When I prepared a patch containing these changes, the speed of the
> BCM4306/2 for OFDM rates more than doubled. As an example, when
> iwconfig is used to set the rate at 36M, the TX rate increased from
> 6.8 to 15.8 Mb/s.
>
> Unfortunately, direct submission of my patch would violate the
> clean-room rules. Michael Buesch has other things that are more
> important. As a result, we need someone to look at the changes on the
> web page and prepare a patch for submission. I will be happy to test
> your submission.
>
> Larry
> _______________________________________________
> Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
