On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:18 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > We really need to disentangle the state tracking rfkill does. People > have said this a million times before, but nobody cares: drivers need to > register hard-blocked and get soft-block states independently, not in a > single enum; API for drivers needs to be, above all, EASY to use.
Also, the rfkill struct itself is a mess. What's get_state() for? Why is this not layered? How can get_state() work correctly, it doesn't poll the device so it doesn't look like software will ever get a state update. Then there's user_claim_unsupported which is set by all drivers but rt2x00, probably because they have hardware kill switches and thus they have to set it even if it's not strictly true, because of the lacking separation between these things (that I pointed out) johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
