On Feb 1, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Michael Buesch wrote:

> On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:26:26 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
>>
>>> The problem also exists in the 5.0 firmware. My test this morning  
>>> died
>>> within 10 minutes. This time, there were only two transmits queued.
>>> The cookies were 0x2048 and 0x204A.
>>>
>>> Larry
>>>
>> I'm happier now... though this means very hard debugging. It would be
>> great if you can crash the original firmware too ;-) If it happens
>> tell us...
>
> Don't you think this is a bit unlikely? We're using the proprietary  
> firmware
> since, well,... ever? This particular version is in use since about  
> a year.
> We didn't have a single report of this.
>
In fact, I was joking! However if it happens...

Jokes apart, I must reproduce this condition to debug it. Larry, would  
you mind loading up a modified firmware with a small kernel patch to  
report a cookie miss without crashing the system?

Cheers,
-FG

>
> -- 
> Greetings, Michael.

-------

Francesco Gringoli, PhD - Assistant Professor
Dept. of Electrical Engineering for Automation
University of Brescia
via Branze, 38
25123 Brescia
ITALY

Ph:  ++39.030.3715843
FAX: ++39.030.380014
WWW: http://www.ing.unibs.it/~gringoli




_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to