On Feb 22, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Gábor Stefanik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Francesco Gringoli > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:54 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: >> >>> Please read the code. There are lots of sanity checks in b43 and >>> mac80211 >>> that make it impossible to receive completely corrupted frames. >> I reconsidered this message because I too did some tests in capturing >> frames with proprietary firmware. As Bo said, we can capture >> corrupted >> frames with R351 but we can't with R410. The reason is that this >> firmware seems to not even check whether or not bit >> B43_MACCTL_KEEP_BAD is set so I believe no kernel patch could correct >> this problem, because it is on the firmware side. >> >> Cheers, >> -FG >> > > Does OpenFWWF or Michael's openfw honor KEEP_BAD? openfwwf does honor the bit.
Cheers, -FG > > > -- > Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) ------- Francesco Gringoli, PhD - Assistant Professor Dept. of Electrical Engineering for Automation University of Brescia via Branze, 38 25123 Brescia ITALY Ph: ++39.030.3715843 FAX: ++39.030.380014 WWW: http://www.ing.unibs.it/~gringoli _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
