On Thursday 20 August 2009 20:16:55 Larry Finger wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Thursday 20 August 2009 19:32:43 Larry Finger wrote: > >> + .id = "FW14", > > > >> + .id = "FW14", > > > > Is the extracted firmware exactly binary equal to the existing FW14? (We > > should not > > trust their version numbers and doublecheck this) > > How does one check this? Any way but a binary comparison? These two > files do include the Rev 16 microcode, which was not present in the > 4.150.10.15 driver.
Then these files are not binary equal to FW14, right? So call them FW15. (If these two added files are in fact identical. Otherwise call them FW15 and FW16). The FW ID is supposed to be a unique identifier for a set of firmware files. So the number of files, their names and their content must exactly match to get the same ID. -- Greetings, Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
