On Thursday 12 November 2009 22:34:00 William Bourque wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Thursday 12 November 2009 20:32:32 William Bourque wrote: > >> Sorry for the late reply... I seem to have the exact same bug here. Do > >> you need more people to run the diagnostic patch? > > > > Well, it doesn't hurt. > > > > Here we go. > > I think we can observe the same problem : > [ 109.273027] b43: Descr. 0: 0x10000000 0x930 0x26296020 0x80000000 > [ 109.273038] b43: Descr. 1: 0x0 0x930 0x26295020 0x80000000 > [ 109.273047] b43: Descr. 2: 0x0 0x930 0x26294020 0x80000000 > ... > This Decr. 0 seems weird to me.
No it looks OK to me. descr0 most likely is the last descriptor in your RX ring, so it has the descriptor-table-end bit set. > Note : I'm using 4kb kernel stack and SLAB (just saying, if I read > correctly the last few mails, you were suspecting something about this). No this has nothing to do with the stack. > I will try with Michael's patch and see what it does. Yeah, please do so. -- Greetings, Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
