Hi Jan, I feel that if we are able to group the concerned contributors and get together an initial draft, we should include that for discussion in the BCOP TF.
I will get back to you in mid-september with updates. Sandoche. On 15/06/2019 01:51, Jan Zorz wrote: > Hi, > > Sounds like a great idea. Should we put you on BCOP TF agenda for > Rotterdam meeting and we discuss it there? > > Cheers, Jan > > On 14/06/2019 04:22, sandoche Balakrichenan wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> The origin for this initiative came from the ICANN SSAC document on DNS >> and IoT : https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-105-en.pdf >> >> As RIPE IoT chairs, we asked (in the RIPE IoT mailing list) whether we >> should prepare a Best Current Operational Practice (BCOP) document in >> RIPE scope for proactively mitigating IoT attacks. >> >> From both the Academy and the Industry, we got interests to contribute >> to this work. Possible contributors name can be found at the end of this >> mail: >> >> Thanks for your input on how to proceed further: >> >> 1. Do you think the topic is useful for the RIPE community? If yes, any >> guidance on how to proceed further will be appreciated. >> 2. Should this discussion be initiated in the RIPE IoT WG and not in >> the BCOP task force? >> 3. Anyone in this mailing list would be interested in contributing or >> provided references to people who will be interested to contribute? >> >> >> People who have already expressed interest in contributing: >> >> *From the Academy: * >> >> 1. Andrzej Duda (http://duda.imag.fr/) >> 2. Maciej Korczynski (http://mkorczynski.com/) >> >> *From the Industry:* >> >> 1. Ad Bresser (SPIN product manager) >> 2. Eliott Lear (CISCO) >> 3. Jacques Latour (CIRA - The Canadian Internet registry) >> 4. Peter Steinhauser (Embedd.com) >> 5. Possiblity from CZNIC (Czech Internet registry) who are involved in >> Turris router project >> >> Sandoche. >> >> >
