Bro not for root partition for home folder. But if data get corrupted then that fs would be useless for me since i gonna store some imp file . Ain't xfs developer fixed that bug.
On 7/11/09, Abu Zaher <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Imtiaz Rahi<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:48 AM, bd lug <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is xfs stable enough for production use? >>> >>> Tell me about its feature / pro's and con's >>> >>> i just know its big file transfer speed is better then other's. >>> >> >> Hi Foisal, >> >> I have been using XFS for my /home and DATA partitions for a long time and >> ofcourse its very stable. >> You are right it can handle large amount of file and bigger size files >> more >> efficiently. >> pros and cons can't tell you in detail. I read on web and started using it >> on my Linux systems few years ago. >> > > I'd recommend not using xfs for the '/' partition, I ran into some > problems a few years back in case of power outtage, the file system > got corrupted. But you could use that for other folders. XFS is way > faster than ext3. > > > -- > Regards > Abu Zaher Md. Faridee > > http://zaher14.blogspot.com/ > --- > Time heals every wound, but time itself is a wound that never heals. > > > ------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe send a blank mail to: > [email protected]! Groups Links > > > > -- ============================== Ishtiaque Ahmed ( Foisal ) Linux Forum : http://forum.linux.org.bd/ http://foisal.wordpress.com pageflakes : http://www.pageflakes.com/darklord.ashx Youtube : http://www.youtube.com/medarklord
