Gil asked if it may be the air conditioning and not the spray that would
affect someone in an airplane.

Studies have shown that the quality of the air inside airplanes can be
lacking.  Poor indoor air can be due to many reasons, one is insufficient
air exchange.  On the ground in houses or buildings, fresh air is introduced
and stale air is taken out.  In airplanes, the fresh air would be supplied
from pressurized sources, which I imagine would be more limited .  The air
inside the plane is largely re-circulated.  Inside, there are a number of
pollutant sources - people, the fragrances they wear, exhaust fumes carried
over from before takeoff , food odors, air fresheners used to mask odors,
residual chemicals used for cleaning,  etc. etc.  The more sensitive
passengers can notice the effect of the poor air quality.  Flight crew who
spend a large fraction of their time in planes have higher exposure to the
contaminants.

The pest control chemicals sprayed in planes are in a different league from
the contaminants typically found in indoor air.  Now you have insecticides
that are intended to kill pests.  Our central nervous system is just as
vulnerable as the nervous system of the pests being targeted.  In addition
to the active ingredients (the insecticides), carrier solvents are used.
These are mostly xylenes, whose effects are known: respiratory, skin and eye
irritation; affects central nervous system; repeated exposure can damage
bone marrow; and may damage liver and kidney (these info are in
manufacturers' Material Safety Data Sheets).  Thirdly, there are the
so-called inert ingredients, many of which are more toxic than the active
ingredients.

Given all of the above, who wants to be sprayed on the plane?  After the
sprays are applied, the residuals will further contaminate the indoor air.

Virginia Salares
(chemist and indoor air researcher)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gil Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Spraying in airplanes etc


> Hi! Hugh and the List,
> The spraying of aircraft coming to OZ and NZ is part of our quarantine
system.
>
> I am explaining, not apologizing.
>
> We have the major problem Down Under, that our life forms are mainly quite
> different from much of the rest of the world. Thus any new import comes
without
> it's predators and something which is not a problem at home, just goes
haywire
> here. Just as some out our exports take over in other people areas, vis
our
> Melaleucas in the Everglades and some of our Acacias in South Africa. Some
of
> our really big problems have been started by scientists bringing in
Biological
> Controls that got away. Example: the Cane Toad was introduced to control a
> beetle in the sugar cane and is now a major problem across most of
tropical
> Australia, having taken out most local species of native frog in the
process.
>
> Our Customs and Quarantine is only going to be tougher, as other counties
become
> more polluted. We see an obligation to try and keep our countries
(Australia and
> New Zealand) as free as possible of diseases and other problems, if for no
other
> reason to provide clean plant and animal stock for other country's
breeding
> programs. For example, we have the only stock of disease free camels and
export
> them to breeding programs in the lands they came from.
>
> You will have heard about our efforts to track down and discourage "Boat
> People", coming from other countries. Our major concern is what they bring
with
> them as the countries through which they travel have Foot and Mouth, New
Castle
> Disease etc, which we do not want. We burn all their possessions along
with
> their boats etc.
>
> Within Australia, we have internal road blocks and we can't move fruit
between
> some areas. We even have four men employed to shoot a particular bird on
the
> boundary between two Bioregions. This is a European bird that goes to huge
> numbers here, but is not in one area.
>
> Are you sure it is the spray that effects you, or the air conditioning? I
have
> lots of problems in air conditioned buildings.
>
> Regards
>
> Gil
>

Reply via email to