Righty-o! Just trying to get a little perspective here.
Thanks for clearing this up! -Allan > >Greg - Hugh - Lorraine - >> >>Please fill me in on this. When did Loraine become 'the best at >>this'? What is her background, what is this testing service that she >>is offering? >> >>AND, why hasn't she tested Lovel's or Courtney's preps? >> >>Thanks >> >>-Allan >> >> >>>>When will all the other "prep" makers in the US and Canada send >>>>theirs to Lorraine to be tested. She's the best at this. I would >>>>think they would be proud to get them tested. I would think that >>>>they would be anxious to know >>>>whether or not their remedies worked as well as they should. > >Allan, > >Why would anyone assume Lorraine hasn't tested "Hugh Lovel's" preps or any >of the rest of that dreck? Since when has making agricultural remedies >become an "I'm better than you are" contest that one has to brag via >Lorraine's (obscure, but in my opinion good)method of testing? Sheesh! Grow >up. My remedies tested 10 times around and kept going so what was the point >in testing further? And Lorraine didn't test for me, as I'm competent to >test my own stuff (by her method) and make whatever claims I please. So be >it. Why? Because I said so, and I'm also not a pompous ass for making such >claims because I say I'm not a pompous ass. Fair enough? > >Best, >Hugh
