>Hugh, Thank you for your feed back.
>
>I think you are right on.
>
>We both know that we are closer in our thinking than the mean of the list, but
>still have some different view points. I think in the interest of the greater
>whole, we should fire away on an open discussion of rain making and the finner
>points of broadcasting, with the right to not put in the public domain the
>very
>latest, as it is on that, which at least you income is to some degrere
>reliant. So
>if we are prepared to talk in terms of one or two year old tecnology, let
>us share
>with the list........
>
>Gil
>


Dear Gil, et. al.,

I don't mind sharing all the latest. Unlike many others I know I don't keep
proprietary knowledge in the hopes I will make money on it. That doesn't
make sense to me because I believe what I'm best at selling is my expertise
rather than some minor application of it. The more I share my expertise the
more I seem to be in demand to teach and share more of my expertise.

So rainmaking? I've had good success, but I don't suppose we are all that
challenged here in the mountains of North Georgia. I'm sure it would be
another story in, say, the Nevada desert. But, hey! The Nevada desert is
rather a toxic place compared to North Georgia, and I'm sure the
disorganizational effects of toxicity have profound effects on the weather.
After all, rain only occurs when the moisture in the atmosphere becomes
organized and condenses enough that clouds and rains occur. You might say
organization is the basis of life, and toxicity is anti-organizational.

Reich, pioneering psychologist and great genius though he was, had a
penchant for making up terms almost as great as L. Ron Hubbard had. Hence
we have his terms of Orgone, Oranur and DOR, along with cloudbuster and
DOR-buster. I think I prefer the use of terms already long in use, such as
organizational energy as compared to orgone energy. But what the heck. We
could use chi or ki if we spoke Chinese or Japanese I suppose.

I rather like Steiner's use of the term ether as in the warmth ether, light
ether, chemical ether, life ether.  Steiner uses this term entirely
differently from the way James Clerk Maxwell did. Steiner's usage of the
term ether is more along the lines of Paul Dirac's abstract, immaterial
pattern medium or ether that gives rise to the wave/particle (or wavicle)
nature of manifest things. Yet Dirac tended to view the ether as a
completely abstract mathematical foundation for phenomena to exist rather
than a fluctuating ether that could be enriched, depleted, stagnated,
poisoned or cleaned up. Both Reich and Steiner, to say nothing of oriental
Qi masters, are clear that plants and animals have etheric bodies that can
be enriched, depleted, etc. And in the general environment our atmosphere,
oceans and soils are permeated with etheric fields and flows even though
these are not embodied in what we know of as living organisms.

When he introduced the remedies sometimes called the BD preps, Steiner
indicated that without introducing a new impulse to revitalize the earth it
would become uninhabitable and die. That is, it WAS dying. The horn humus
and horn silica remedies imparted such new impulses for the soil and the
atmosphere. To link the two there should also be a horn clay remedy, and in
my rainmaking as well as my field broadcaster I use such a remedy. You
might say these remedies, and the others Steiner introduced to support
these, can be used to enrich and clean up the ether fields on our planet.

What Hugh Courtney found out was if we applied these remedies in a morning
and evening sequence during a drought they tended to bring in rain. Another
way of looking at it is they cleared up atmospheric stagnation, restoring
organization to the atmosphere so that moisture clumped up in clouds and
rain occurred. What my field broadcasting taught me was we didn't have to
apply these remedies singly in tedious sequencing. We could combine them
into an atmospheric complex and a soil complex and use these complexes in a
morning and evening rhythm. This ended up working the best of all methods
and could be applied to an area drawn on a map and treated with a radionic
instrument such as a Hieronymus analyser or a Malcolm Rae extended range
potentizer with interrupter. I can take my reagents out of the wells of my
broadcaster and copy them on a water vial (labeled) with my Hieronymus
analyser by putting the vial on the plate and the reagents in the well with
the dials set on zero-zero. Then I can use the vial in the well of my
Malcolm Rae along with a map of my farm's boundaries and treat in the early
morning with horn silica, summer horn clay, horsetail, dandelion, valerian
and nettle remedies. then again in the late afternoon I will do another
treatment with horn manure, winter horn clay, yarrow, chamomile, oak bark
and nettle remedies. I can repeat this procedure for as many days as I
wish. And I can shine color slides in the well on the map and use lemon to
break up atmospheric congestion, red to expand and blue to contract, indigo
for shock and green to restore the atmosphere's equivalent of its immune
system etc. Plus I can add remedies for planets, constellations, stars,
etc. The Rae instrument can be varied in its blinking on and off. Each
blink is a microscopic change at a point that can effect large scale
changes in the medium. A couple hundred per minute makes a very effective
treatment.

Best,
Hugh

Reply via email to