To join the campaign, or get full instructions on how to help shut down
Indian Point visit: http://www.riverkeeper.org/new/indianpoint/index.html

For Immediate Release
Contact:  LCG Communications: 718.853.5568;

March 26, 2002                                                 917.775.1940;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Poll Shows No Confidence In Emergency Evacuation Plan for Indian Point


Riverkeeper Releases Results of Marist Poll on Workability of Regional
Evacuation for Indian Point Nuclear Plant; Calls on Governor Pataki To Close
Indian Point Due to Inadequacy of Plan to Protect Public Health and Safety

Riverkeeper, a Hudson River-based environmental group, released the results
of a Marist Institute poll on the workability of evacuation plans for the
region in case of a catastrophic nuclear accident or attack at the Indian
Point nuclear plant in Buchanan, New York.  Many, including government
officials, consider the plant a prime potential terrorist target in the wake
of the September 11th World Trade Center attack.

An emergency evacuation plan currently exists for only the 10-mile radius
around the plant, although, in case of an attack or accident, people within
a 50-mile radius are also at risk.  More than 20 million people live within
50 miles of the plant, including those living within the five boroughs of
New York City and in 21 other counties in New York, Connecticut, New Jersey
and Pennsylvania.

The most startling poll results deal directly with those who live within the
ten-mile evacuation zone, where an evacuation plan exists:


�        A vast majority -- 61% of those polled -- feel that the evacuation
plan is not workable;

�        76% of those polled would attempt to evacuate anyway, even though
72% feel they are not familiar with what they're supposed to do in the event
of an accident;

�        Only 33% -- one third -- of residents who live within ten miles of
Indian Point have read or looked at the official evacuation plan;

�        A scant 3% of residents who live within ten miles of the plant can
name an evacuation reception center.


And, even though there is no evacuation plan at all for those beyond the
10-mile radius:


�        60% of the people within the larger, 50-mile zone would attempt to
evacuate;

�        77% of residents who live within fifty miles of the plant believe
there should be an evacuation plan for their community.


"The poll confirms that in the event of an accident at Indian Point, chaos
would reign," said Riverkeeper's Executive Director, Alex Matthiessen.
"Imagine 12 million people, equipped
with a mere paper plan or possibly no plan at all, trying to evacuate the
area all at once -- it would be sheer pandemonium and many would not survive
it."

"We decided to undertake this poll because we wanted to see how prepared New
Yorkers are for an attack, how well they understand evacuation procedures,
and how they would respond.  Now we know, and the answers are frightening,"
Matthiessen added. "Without a workable evacuation plan, Governor Pataki
simply cannot guarantee the health and safety of the 20 million people who
live in the New York metropolitan area.  If he takes an honest look at
emergency preparedness, he can only conclude that the plant must be closed,"
he added.

The poll also revealed that, although parents are not supposed to pick up
children from school should an evacuation become necessary during school
hours, fully 73% of those polled who have children would ignore the plan and
would go get their children anyway. While Westchester County Executive Spano
is currently attempting to improve the plan to allow parents to pick up
their children, serious questions remain as to how that will happen given
the torrent of evacuees who will be fleeing the emergency zone in the event
of an actual accident.

Susan Shapiro, a parent from Pomona in Rockland County said, "My child goes
to school in the ten-mile zone and her evacuation is dependent on buses that
do not exist. There are not enough buses to evacuate school children.  In
fact, the evacuation plan calls for bus drivers to make multiple trips into
the emergency zone."

Joseph Mangano, National Coordinator with the Radiation and Public Health
Project, said, "As a health researcher with expertise in the field of
radiation and its effects, I know that the health consequences of an
accident or an attack at Indian Point are potentially catastrophic. If an
incident were to occur on a day when the winds were blowing toward New York
City, there might well be very few places to which people could safely
evacuate. Many thousands of people rushing to get out or remaining behind
could suffer all kinds of serious health effects from radiation exposure,
including myriad cancers, thyroid ailments, respiratory and immune
diseases�."

The poll, conducted by phone from February 18th through March 7th, surveyed
a total of 1,118 residents, 505 of whom live within the ten-mile radius of
the plant and 613 of whom live within a fifty-mile radius. The results of
these samples are statistically significant at +/- 4.5% and

+/- 4%, respectively. (For questions regarding how the poll was conducted,
contact Barbara Carvalho at the Marist Institute for Public Opinion @
845.575.5050.)

The results of a companion poll, regarding whether or not Indian Point
should be closed, will be released next week. Additionally, the New York
City Council is scheduling hearings in April to solicit public input on a
resolution calling for the shutdown of Indian Point.

(If you have not received the full text of the poll and would like a copy,
please contact LCG Communications:  718.853.5568; 917.775.1940;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to Riverkeeper's website:
www.riverkeeper.org.  To obtain a copy of Assemblyman Richard Brodsky's
report detailing the emergency evacuation plan's flaws, contact his office
at 914.345.0432)


Riverkeeper is a member-based, not-for-profit environmental organization
dedicated to

 protecting the Hudson River and the New York City drinking water supply.
...............................................
Be the change
you want to see in the world.
-- Mahatma Gandhi



Reply via email to