Dear Hugh, I am delighted to have read your description of matters atomic and the gradual scaling toward greater complexity that you have laid before us. There are a few considerations, however, that you may be holding in your heart for which the progression of affairs may depend that perception could most dearly benefit. Perhaps a few questions may help:
Given that reciprocation with photons is stipulated as the source of vibration and resonation, are we to consider that the "active" photon is the primary carrying factor for the ego phenomena and not the "passive" electron-carrying hydrogen atom? Where in this scheme do the integrated "ether" forces impress themselves into the physical material? Could it be that the "ether/life" forces impress themselves into the material, offering a source for reciprocity and instigating resonance by the atom and its electron in harmony with that ether? Indication has been received that a trough proceeds containing an electron that "gravitates" around a speeding and spinning hydrogen proton; that "wavecrests" are formed in the wake of the electron-trough phenomena. The question here concerns the nature of the "vibration" of the electron and its trough-bed. Is the concept of vibration describable in the following manner: vibration is a movement of a target-seeker toward a target-source only to have that target source remove itself to a new curvature, causing goal-failure on the part of the target-seeker, in turn causing the bed-trough and its indwelling electron's move to the other side of the imaginary un-vibrating line toward the moving target-source, generating a new thrust for the target-source? Is "vibration" of matter a resonance in reciprocity against (in and out of) invisible etheric forces permeating throughout matter? Does the new absorption of photon-energy or any emission of photon-energy giving impetus to a higher or lower level of circumferential length about the proton change the cited essential description of electron activity? Is this an appropriate picture of the yin-yang and ongoing vibration of the electron and its trough-bed? Does the hydrogen atom as a whole have complicit in its own activity, a bed-trough and a concomitant "wavecrest" about its trough being? Is the hydrogen atom (with electron[s]) itself active and resonating with reciprocity toward an invisible etheric bed? In closing, my request contained in the previous post is further complexified. Please regard the above questions in the light of your certainly well earned outlook on matters of reality. Regards Judson Hugh Lovel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Hi Hugh and forum, >> >>Recently, Hugh, you indicated the concept of resonance as a most basic >>essence in atomic and physical manifestation. Can you please elaborate as >>much as you would on this factor of resonance? To what does resonance owe >>at this most basic level? >> >>Respectfully, >>Judson Chambers > >Dear Judson, > >Maybe I can give a few examples of resonance and how it can affect our >lives in simple and dramatic ways. From this I think it will follow that it >also affects our lives in more complex and less clearcut or dramatic ways. > >Some singers have been known to take a crystal wineglass and ting it with >their fingernail to ascertain the musical note it vibrates or is resonant >to. Then they will sing that note with such force it vibrates the glass so >strongly it shatters. Or you can take a violin string tuned to a nearby >violin string and saw your bow across the one and see the other vibrate in >resonance. > >Imagine a bell with clapper. The clapper hits the bell in only one spot, >introducing active vibration in the bell. Voila! The whole bell rings in >resonance to this point strike. > >Imagine then there is a hydrogen atom, a lone proton with an electron held >in its attraction. A photon impinges on the orbitals of the electron and >imparts its energy at one level, making the electron "ring" or vibrate so >strongly throughout that orbital that the electron jumps up to the next >orbital. > >Around a hydrogen atom the configuration of the orbitals is spherical. >Within any given sphere forming the orbital the wave nature of the electron >comes around and wavecrest meets wavecrest, trough meets trough, and the >electron resonates at that level, its wave pattern reinforcing itself. The >waves will not meet and reinforce themselves again for a considerable >distance away from the nucleus until they reach the next higher resonance >level. And if the electron jumps from a lower to a higher level it has to >absorb enegry (photons) of a certain wavelength to reach the next resonant >level. If it falls back down to a lower level it will emit photons of a >certain wavelength in doing so. Thus we have an explanation of hydrogen's >emission and absorption spectra, which are specific patterns of lines >across a wide band of wavelengths. > >>From hydrogen it gets quite complex, with helium (two electrons), lithium >(3), etc. on up the periodic table, and of course with the combination of >the many elements. Carbon chemistry is particularly complex, and silica, >germanium, tin and lead are all in the carbon family so they enter into >many of the same chemical relationships with other elements as carbon. > >However, it is worth considering what happens to our world around us when >we introduce certain patterns of vibration. The chemistry of the world >around us will tend to organize its relationships in accordance with those >patterns. The world around us is constantly changing along its time lines. >So the idea of a stream of changing nature phenomena is important. This >clearly comes into play with air and water dynamics where the patterns of >flow can be markedly affected by the minutest changes at virtual points. >Although the change introduced is infinitessimal, downstream the effect is >huge. Thus a few drops of a homeopathic potency of 30c Arsenicum album can >relieve acute ptomaine poisoning at the seafood bar in just minutes--though >it does take a few minutes for full effect. This is essentially the same >idea with applying Steiner's agricultural remedies. It just takes a wee bit >to have profound effects. > >With a powerful induction coil (my field broadcasters have a two inch >diameter coil two foot long with 86 turns in both the top section, for the >atmosphere, and the bottom section, for the soil) the effect is more than >infinitessimal and is continuous over time so that even something as >resistant to change as the soil, plants and animals can be affected >gradually but markedly. But for the effect to be powerful the induction >field must be anchored so it resonates right on top of itself all the time. >You might think of it as being like a web. Of what effect would a spider's >web be if it was not anchored anywhere? But anchor it and the field effect >is stable and reinforces itself. This is what the hydrogen nucleus does is >it anchors the electron around it so it forms orbitals. Likewise the sun >anchors the planets that orbit it, and the galactic center anchors the >stars whirling around in its spiral clutches, etc. > >Well, I hope this helps. I'm out of time. Back to work growing food. > >Best, >Hugh Lovel >Visit our website at: www.unionag.org > > __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
