Hi Lloyd,
yes I think you are a bit biased regarding canola.
In Europe you will find b.d. and organic farmers who grow canola (rape) in the
rotation followed by wheat which is normally the best yielding wheat in the
roatation,  and the soil structure after the crop is pretty good if you
cultivate the paddock after harvest shallow you will get a greenmanure crop for
free . In relation to greenmanure crops - the idea of including  any kind of
mustard seeds in a greenmanure crop mix is very good because it adds a different
root system and a very different leaf organisation to capture sun energy and one
could think that mustards could activate the sulphur process in the soil ( I
can`t proof that but).
If for instance Wild reddish would be a problem it would be worthwhile using
mustards in mixture with other plants as greenmanure crops and see what would
happen to the vitality
of the wild reddish.Of course you would have to do a few other things as well
and probably be a patient.
Cheers Tobias
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    Re: Bio-fumigation 
Author: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:       17/05/2002 10:17


----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Barrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:00 AM
Subject: Bio-fumigation


> Hi BDNow!ers,
>
> Has anybody got any experience with using bio-fumigation of soils -
> basically using brassicas to fumigate the soil for other crops?  It is
> supposed to be a common practise in Australia.
>
> Stephen Barrow

Hi Stephen
                   Yes canola or oilseed rape (thats what it does to your
soil) in the rotation is common in Aus and has proven very successful short
term for conventional farmers BUT the whole agronomic system is driven by
the need to increase chemical and fertiliser sales to farmers and canola has
been pivotal to that effort. We see rapidly escalating rates of urea and
anhydrous ammonia and a switch back to newer, more expensive, patented
chemicals. Believe me if you were anything other than a crop plant on one of
these farms you better hide!
                    Much better wheat crops the year following canola due to
the disease break and leftover nitrate nitrogen (its a very inefficient user
of applied fertiliser) However nobody has yet published the literature that
shows what a voracious feeder of trace minerals this crop is and also very
hard on sulphur. Its a hungry crop - we grew it for ten years and quit - two
years ago when the GMO thing started to get going in this country - Monsanto
and Aventis will see to it that any farmer that continues to grow canola
will end up GMO contaminated despite his best efforts to the contrary.
                     There would maybe be a good case for using the older
style fodder rape as a green manure - that way at least the minerals are not
exported - but why not forget it and use legumes. My advice to anyone that
is not already growing canola or mustard for grain would be do yourself a
favour and don't start!!
OK so I'm biased
Cheers
Lloyd Charles
>
>


 

Received: from vogon.agric.nsw.gov.au [148.145.12.1] by smtpgwy.agric.nsw.gov.au 
(ccMail Link to SMTP R8.20.00.25)
        ; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:20:26 +1000
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poweredge.greenmarketplace.com (dsl027-159-039.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net 
[216.27.159.39])
        by vogon.agric.nsw.gov.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4H0FOl32629
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:15:25 +1000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by poweredge.greenmarketplace.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with SMTP id 
g4H0FJi0016202;
        Thu, 16 May 2002 20:15:20 -0400
Received: from vines.webfront.net.au (mail.webfront.net.au [203.23.200.12])
        by poweredge.greenmarketplace.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id 
g4H0CRi0016104
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 May 2002 20:12:31 -0400
Received: from cat (web-ltn-075.webfront.net.au [203.23.201.75])
        by vines.webfront.net.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g4H0CI438218
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:12:19 +1000 (EST)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Message-ID: <001001c1fd38$537113c0$4bc917cb@cat>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Lloyd Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bio-fumigation
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:17:36 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09/990901/11:28 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN

Reply via email to