|
D&S,
The Radionics Wizard weekend must of been very interesting
indeed. The world of subtle energies certainly can spike our
curiosity. I have to admit, though, that I like to keep a grain of
skepticism when it comes to certain subject. Because, I'd only heard
a bit about radionics, I decided to look it up on the web. The WWW is
packed with pages explaining the phenomenon. Gosh... some will even sell
you a PC version?!?
First I should say that I'm keeping my mind open to the
technology, especially if it permits us to visualize the effect of biodynamics
(as in the Kolisko research). Having said that, philosophically, I feel
the need to ponder the matter from various point of views.
Here is what I found and wish to bring to the
debate.
- Seems like Dr. Albert Abrams started it all with the
discovery that certain diseases have specific vibratory rates that can be
detected by tapping on abdomen of spine. Then a machine containing an
ohm-meter, rheostat, condenser, and other electrical gadgets all wired together
was developed to facilitate the process of reading "subtle
energies".
- Then Dr. Ruth Drown tested the theory with experiments and
even found that one could create X-Ray like pictures of patients from a
distance- any distance- provided the operator had a blood sample. Thus she
"proved that it work". Well... hmmm... I think that
one can never prove anything (or it is very difficult), but should try to
falsify a theory. It is much to easy to become bias when "proving"
something... Call it a human fault...
- In 1950, the University of Chicago formed a committee to
investigate Dr. Drown's methods (seeing she had great success...). The
official comment of the committee turned out to be:
"...On the face of it, the Drown claims appear to be totally unworthy of serious consideration by anyone, least of all a university. However, certain friends who are members of lay boards that have been of great assistance to the university have urged that the Drown claims be investigated so that they may be repudiated if found unworthy or adapted to the benefit of mankind if they should prove to be worthy... "
I wonder
if we are not facing a placebo effect, which is totally fine by me if it heals,
or help humanity. Or, is radionics really all that it promises to be, or
yet another mystical phenomenon that only exists for those who already have
faith that is works. In any case, I judge not, keep my mind open, but give
myself the right to question. A good debate is probably
needed...
What is your feeling on this subject having been to a recent
conference? Have you found a pragmatic purpose for this tool
for biodynamic farmers? For example, could we use the technology to
ascertain plant health, or diagnose soil health conditions? DO have an
idea what kind of experiments we could perform to "test" the efficiency of
radionics?
Finally
to quote the father of radionics:
``The physician is only allowed to think he knows it all, but the quack, ungoverned by conscience, is permitted to know he knows it all; and with a fertile mental field for humbuggery, truth can never successfully compete with untruth.'' - Dr. Albert Abrams
|
- The Wizards weekend D & S Chamberlain
- Re: The Wizards weekend Robin Duchesneau
- Re: The Wizards weekend Gil Robertson
- Re: The Wizards weekend Hugh Lovel
- Re: The Wizards weekend Cheryl Kemp
- Re: The Wizards weekend D & S Chamberlain
- Re: The Wizards weekend Lloyd Charles
- Re: The Wizards weekend Hugh Lovel
- Re: The Wizards weekend Robin Duchesneau
- Re: The Wizards weekend Hugh Lovel
- Re: The Wizards weekend Glen Atkinson
- Re: The Wizards weekend Hugh Lovel
