I posted the comment below in the hopes of stimulating some interest in posting and discussing the work of the Kolisko's through their monumental book, Agriclture of Tomorrow.
Gosh, it didn't provoke a single rise. Is there really no interest on BD Now! in this most important work, which was initially directed by RS himself? -Allan >>About eight or ten years ago, I heard a talk by an agricultural >>homoeopath, who >>stated some potencies sedated, while others stimulated, some are life >>supporting and some are life suppressing. I can't find my notes at the moment >>and I wondered if you had come across this or found it in the work you have >>done. I am concerned that some of us armed with only part knowledge, may be >>using potencies that have an effect other than the one we are aiming to have. > >Gil - The Kolisko's tracked this information and reported it in >AGRICULTURE of TOMORROW, which, unfortunately, is out of print. What >you say is correct: one potency may do wonders and the next 'higher' >may do almost the opposite. Potentization, for the practical farmer, >is something you want to know a lot about before you start using it >on your crop lands or pastures. > >I was posting some of this this information to BD Now! last year, >but the apparent lack of interest didn't make it seem worth the >effort(s). > >For those in North America who want an introduction to potentization >from an experienced practitioner, don't miss Glen Atkinson at the >Mid-Atlantic Biodynamic Food and Farming Conference on Oct 4-6 of >this year or his workshop later in the month in Northen California. > >-Allan
