Lloyd Charles wrote: >Subject: Re: Eco-Footprints > > >>mroboz wrote: >> >>>In case anybody is intrested, I got a nice low Ecological Footprint >>>total of 4.92, well below the average for the US (and presumably >>>Canada). Michael >>> >I got 3.93 - figured I must have cheated so went back a couple more times. >Initially I selected no running water - we provide our own not connected to >any official supply (it falls on the roof - tank storage - comes out the >tap?) When I changed that one thing the score went up to 5.19 -I guess that >says something about the cost of providing services to city residents! >Cheers >Lloyd Charles > > > Better believe it, mine is 5.17 :(
roger
