Allan
I am happy to help with this work but need some direction - I have
only a photo copy version of the book - (there are a lot of colour photos in
the original that loose most of their meaning in a b&w copy) - There are
also a lot of graph results of the experiments. I can scan the text onto the
list easy enough but a lot of it is explanation of graphs that I can only
get on as attachments - to discuss this properly I think readers really need
to be able to look at the graphs. Two possibilities - convert the graphs
into lists of numbers, boring for the reader and a lot of work typing, or
scan as attachments send to you and you put them up as officially sanitised
virus free attachments to be downloaded if desired??(this way we also
maintain the format meaning of the text passages) Would this work ?? Also
what is the limit as far as size of quoted material posted - my thinking on
this is if it goes up as complete chunks then readers can download and print
out relevant bits of the book (chapter at a time) whereas if we hack it
around thats not then possible. Is the interest out there to make any of
this worth doing???
Cheers
Lloyd Charles
----- Original Message -----
From: Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: Kolisko's work
> I really encourage everyone to eat biodynamically grown food at every
> opportunity.
>
> We have the fellow at the Steiner e-lib willing to publish the book
> on-line, all we have to do is someone the Will forces to get him
> copies of what he needs (Is someone REALLY sending him a photocopy,
> or is this a misunderstanding?)
>
> I don't care if the book gets on-line or not. We can discuss it a
> chapter at a time here on BD Now! and anyone who wants to read the
> whole thing can plumb the archives.
>
> The trend in the US has been to strengthen intellectual property
> rights. As far as I know, copyright on printed matter has been
> extended some ungodly length of time. While it is easy to see this as
> a way of insuring income to the author and his descendents, it is
> also easy to see it as a way of keeping 'dangerous ideas' away from a
> larger audience.
>
> This work, Agriculture of Tomorrow, needs to be read by everyone and
> discussed and re-examined as much as possible. We need to perform
> trials based on the Kolisko's suggestions.
>
> Because, like they say, if the Kolisko's are correct in their
> research, well, then, it makes everything completely different.
>
> What say, my friends?
>
> -Allan
>
>
> >Following is a dialogue with the publisher
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for your information. I had a
> >discreet chat with a copyright lawyer last night, he said whatever
> >you do, do not copy the book as a whole or put it on the web at all.
> >So I think we just have to live with it.
> >
> >Cheers roger
> >
> >**************************************************************
> >
> >on 14/8/02 11:25 pm, Roger Pye at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >Subject: Re: Agriculture of Tommorrow: Kolisko, Eugen
> >
> >> General Manager
> >> Kolisko Archive Publications
> >>
> >>
> >> Dear Sir/Madam,
> >>
> >> Do you have any plans for the reprint of the subject title? In my work
I
> >> am receiving many enquiries for it.
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >>
> >>
> >> Roger Pye
> >> Earthcare Environmental Solutions
> >> +61 2 6255 3824
> >>
> >Thank you for tyour enquiry.
> >
> >Yes we are planning a reprint. Time-scale as yet not known.
> >
> >Kind regards,
> >
> >
> >Andrew Clunies-Ross
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Gil Robertson wrote:
> >
> >>Hi! Christy,
> >>I have tried to get an answer from the copyright holder, but they
> >>do not seem to to be able to reply to emails.
>
>
