Lloyd Charles wrote: >Hi Allan and other list members > >This is all working good for me too. I have had no problems with the >workings of this list at any stage since joining (fell off a couple of >times but the archive is open to all so its a simple matter to keep up via >archive until you are reinstated) and I would like to congratulate Allan for >setting this up . Its simple, open, free of advertising garbage and other >assorted internet junk, and best of all it works! >So for any of you that are maybe a bit cheesed off of late by the >"strippings" here is my experience with compost tea list. Which was once >here and working OK - I have tried to no avail to get connected since they >moved - I just wasted another hour and a half this morning - the yahoo site >is a clutter of commercial rubbish, every time I tried to get on I was told >someone else was already using my name and login and I should go away and >think up another one - I finally got in this morning (I thought) then >couldnt find the archive - the whole thing has been frustrating and if I >eventually succeed the site is a mess of other stuff and slow to operate as >well. So hang in there we have got a good thing going with this list > I don't think anyone's complaining about the list set-up, Lloyd, certainly I'm not. It is frustrating when I go to read a message and there's nothing there but it would not make me quit as a member, and I don't think it would anyone else. I'd just like to find out why this glitch is occurring and there's no harm in that.
roger
