For info on small scale, no-till without chemicals check out Lee Rich's
Weedless Gardening, available at www.workman.com

-----Original Message-----
From: RH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [globalnews] Farmers Fight Global Warming with No-Till Farming


>10/6/2002 10:08:55 AM, "RiverValley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote in response to a "No-Till" article posted by Jane:
>
>>I'm wondering if members of the list
>>have experience using no-till in a
>>small farm, market garden setting,
>>particularly in mild climates like the
>>pacific northwest US.  What problems,
>>successes have people had?  What types
>>of tillage and tillage tools do people
>>use and prefer?
>
>Daniel, modern no-till involves first killing off the
>vegetation with chemicals and then planting through the
>stubble.  For further proof of its insidious nature, I suggest
>you go down in the original article a few paragraphs until you
>find this sentence:
>
>"There are economic and environmental drawbacks to no-till,
>including the fact that more pesticide is usually needed to
>fight the organisms that find homes in the residue."
>
>The no-till scheme Jane posted is a chemical Trojan horse and I
>suggest you stay away from it.  I suspect she was just trying
>to warn us of the danger.  No-till pushers are in the category
>of those who coin "war is peace" and "slavery is freedom"
>doublespeak phrases.
>
>The half-inch of woody waste that no-till chemical shills brag
>about amounts to dip-squat when measured against the 5%-10%
>soil organic matter that good farming practice can achieve with
>consistent cover crop plowdown and proper soil
>remineralization.
>
>Having said all that, I'll add that there is one Pennsylvania
>farmer who has perfected a no-till system involving a huge
>flattening roller that he crushes his cover crops with.  He
>then plants through the residue.  As far as I know, he uses no
>toxic chemicals.  I believe Rodale made a video of his tomato
>operations.
>
>Regards,
>Rex Harrill
>
>
>

Reply via email to