Dear Lloyd, I agree on the point of ill timed use of 501. There is sometimes a tendency to become too enthused with an idea. Heaven knows I can do it all the time. When the work at Dalgetty is being discussed it is in broad general terms of what is happening there. Roger informs me today of many trials that he is proposing to implement, to confirm or reject the basic hypothesis that has been proposed on the use of BD50. What I think has been shown is that BD preps are not quite as benign as they may appear. There may be many applications for their use that haven't been dreamt of yet. Since Cheryl Kemp introduced me to Biodynamics a few years ago I have only began to understand the action of a few of the preps, and how to use them on our farm. What I find fascinating is how you can predict by use of radionic analysis what the likely result of using any substance will be. Remember on the Saturday evening at the Wizards conference at Bellingen when a group of us were playing around with your new Don Mattioda instrument.It was amazing to stack up the inputs and see the variations in readings from various combinations substances. It is certainly better to be able to try out a strategy and see if it is likely to work than to go gung ho and wind up with egg on your face. Wishing you the best of luck with your tests with weed control. There is light at the end of the tunnel. It is not a train coming but a horde of people moving out of the darkness to see how Agricultural radionics may be able to help with seemingly intractable farming problems. That is what you can hear. Sincere regards, James
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lloyd Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:23 PM Subject: Re: changing focus 501 >
