Hi! Hugh, As always, you are right on the money. I have spent many years as a relationship councillor, first on the phones at "Life Line", and for the past ten years as part of my "Free Clinic". Again mostly by phone, some by email. About eighty percent of my clients are female. My clients are mainly relationship, with some bereavement.. I am also involved in a community based organisation, which looks after the interests of aged widows. Additionally most of my close friends are female, of whom Fran refers to, collectively as "Gil's Harem", but in reality, many of whom are also her close friends.
The broad message I got is that very few of these ladies, have or have had in the past, a sexual relationship that measures up to their needs and expectations. I am seven years older than my brother. I am also four years older than "young" Hugh. "My " generation, as we went through high school and beyond, had a high level of promiscuity and a healthy libido. By contrast, my brother's generation has a large number of homosexuals and bisexuals. By a large number I mean something over eighty percent. As far as we can see, the main dietary difference was the introduction of cheap chicken raised on growth hormones. These included the chemical castration of male chickens to allow abnormal growth. Talking to the sexual partners of this group of males, those who are in in male/ female relationships, are not performing as their fathers and grandfather had done, without putting too fine a point on it. I think the junk food industry has a lot to answer for...... Gil Hugh Lovel wrote: > Dear Barbara and Woody, et. al., snip Many married > couples are not only not having sex, but that in the majority of these > cases it is the man who doesn't want it, etc
