James, Lloyd and Gil, thanks for picking up this thread.
I think that the personal attention/intent aspect of broadcasting should
not be overlooked, just as the physical application of the preps shouldn�t
(even while broadcasting). More effect is what we�re after, no? I do like
the idea of broadcasting though, especially in my situation (full daytime
job). The notion of having the preps affect the farm while I�m not there
is an attractive one. This time of year (short days),stirring and spraying
usually occurs only on the weekend!
Gil, I think automating the broadcaster could have its place ('vacations',
wilderness broadcasting) but why would you want to encourage a situation
where less attention would be paid (less effect?)? I bet it would be
difficult to time 'out' all the different negative periods.
I�m curious however, to the timing of the broadcasts. How does one figure
which events are detrimental? Are all trines negative in their effect? Are
there certain conjunctions/oppositions that might have a positive effect?
Does one want to not broadcast during the entire retrograde of mercury, or
just when it starts (and ends). What about when other planets go retro.
Stella blacks out the two hours around changes in four-fold periods
(root/leaf/flower). Is there an advantage to pulling (and putting)
reagents this frequently?
How can one understand these detrimental times better?
Sorry for the avalanche of questions (it was an effort not to include
more), but I�m just trying to pick up on the mindset. The farther one can
go with logical progression the better chances one has to fly when they
take that leap of faith.
Not wanting to blindly follow the calendar, and
still on the (very) front edge of the learning curve,
Ed
