Title: FW: [globalnews] A Triumphant Virtual March
Jane,
 
What do you think about this post?  Surely their is validity here? And surely while so many in the "antiwar" debate are seriously concerned they are often deluded by the professional "antiwarries" who just want an excuse to wage a war of words against Bush and Blair.  If we are really serious let's get the BB's to hunt the real tyrant here rather than bomb the life out of Iraq.  Iraq needs deliverance not bombing, but are the anti war people really helping the innocents or protecting the very guilty HS.
 
Keith
 
Voice of Iraqis
By Amir Taheri

Could I have the microphone for one minute to tell the people about my
life?" asked the Iraqi grandmother.

I spent part of a recent Saturday with the antiwar marchers in London in the
company of some Iraqi friends. Our aim had been to persuade the organizers
to let at least one Iraqi voice to be heard. Soon, however, it became clear
that the organizers were as anxious to stifle the voice of the Iraqis in
exile as was Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

The Iraqis had come with placards reading "Freedom for Iraq" and "American
rule, a hundred thousand times better than Takriti tyranny!"

But the tough guys who supervised the march would have none of that. Only
official placards, manufactured in thousands and distributed among the
"spontaneous" marchers, were allowed. These read "Bush and Blair,
baby-killers," " Not in my name," "Freedom for Palestine," and "Indict Bush
and Sharon."

Not one placard demanded that Saddam should disarm to avoid war.

The goons also confiscated photographs showing the tragedy of Halabja, the
Kurdish town where Saddam's forces gassed 5,000 people to death in 1988.

We managed to reach some of the stars of the show, including Reverend Jesse
Jackson, the self-styled champion of American civil rights. One of our
group, Salima Kazim, an Iraqi grandmother, managed to attract the reverend's
attention and told him how Saddam Hussein had murdered her three sons
because they had been dissidents in the Baath Party; and how one of her
grandsons had died in the war Saddam had launched against Kuwait in 1990.

"Could I have the microphone for one minute to tell the people about my
life?" 78-year-old Salima demanded.

The reverend was not pleased.

"Today is not about Saddam Hussein," he snapped. "Today is about Bush and
Blair and the massacre they plan in Iraq." Salima had to beat a retreat,
with all of us following, as the reverend's gorillas closed in to protect
his holiness.

We next spotted former film star Glenda Jackson, apparently manning a stand
where "antiwar" characters could sign up to become "human shields" to
protect Saddam's military installations against American air attacks.

"These people are mad," said Awad Nasser, one of Iraq's most famous
modernist poets. "They are actually signing up to sacrifice their lives to
protect a tyrant's death machine."

The former film star, now a Labor party member of parliament, had no time
for "side issues" such as the 1.2 million Iraqis, Iranians, and Kuwaitis who
have died as a result of Saddam's various wars.

We thought we might have a better chance with Charles Kennedy, a
boyish-looking, red-headed Scot who leads the misnamed Liberal Democrat
party. But he, too, had no time for "complex issues" that could not be
raised at a mass rally.

"The point of what we are doing here is to tell the American and British
governments that we are against war," he pontificated. "There will be ample
time for other issues."

But was it not amazing that there could be a rally about Iraq without any
mention of what Saddam and his regime have done over almost three decades?
Just a little hint, perhaps, that Saddam was still murdering people in his
Qasr al-Nayhayah (Palace of the End) prison, and that as the Westerners
marched, Iraqis continued to die?

Not a chance.

We then ran into Tony Benn, a leftist septuagenarian who has recycled
himself as a television reporter to interview Saddam in Baghdad.

But we knew there was no point in talking to him. The previous night he had
appeared on TV to tell the Brits that his friend Saddam was standing for
"the little people" against "hegemonistic America."

"Are these people ignorant, or are they blinded by hatred of the United
States?" Nasser the poet demanded.

The Iraqis would had much to tell the "antiwar" marchers, had they had a
chance to speak. Fadel Sultani, president of the National Association of
Iraqi authors, would have told the marchers that their action would
encourage Saddam to intensify his repression.

"I had a few questions for the marchers," Sultani said. "Did they not
realize that oppression, torture and massacre of innocent civilians are also
forms of war? Are the antiwar marchers only against a war that would
liberate Iraq, or do they also oppose the war Saddam has been waging against
our people for a generation?"

Sultani could have told the peaceniks how Saddam's henchmen killed dissident
poets and writers by pushing page after page of forbidden books down their
throats until they choked.

Hashem al-Iqabi, one of Iraq's leading writers and intellectuals, had hoped
the marchers would mention the fact that Saddam had driven almost four
million Iraqis out of their homes and razed more than 6,000 villages to the
ground.

"The death and destruction caused by Saddam in our land is the worst since
Nebuchadnezzar," he said. "These prosperous, peaceful, and fat Europeans are
marching in support of evil incarnate." He said that, watching the march, he
felt Nazism was "alive and well and flexing its muscles in Hyde Park."

Abdel-Majid Khoi, son of the late Grand Ayatollah Khoi, Iraq's foremost
religious leader for almost 40 years, spoke of the "deep moral pain" he
feels when hearing the so-called " antiwar" discourse.

"The Iraqi nation is like a man who is kept captive and tortured by a gang
of thugs," Khoi said. "The proper moral position is to fly to help that man
liberate himself and bring the torturers to book. But what we witness in the
West is the opposite: support for the torturers and total contempt for the
victim."

Khoi said he would say ahlan wasahlan (welcome) to anyone who would liberate
Iraq.

"When you are being tortured to death you are not fussy about who will save
you," he said.

Ismail Qaderi, a former Baathist official but now a dissident, wanted to
tell the marchers how Saddam systematically destroyed even his own party,
starting by murdering all but one of its 16 original leaders.

"Those who see Saddam as a symbol of socialism, progress, and secularism in
the Arab world must be mad," he said.

Khalid Kishtaini, Iraq's most famous satirical writer, added his complaint.

"Don't these marchers know that the only march possible in Iraq under Saddam
Hussein is from the prison to the firing-squad?" he asked. "The Western
marchers behave as if the US wanted to invade Switzerland, not Iraq under
Saddam Hussein."

With all doors shutting in our faces we decided to drop out of the show and
watch the political zoology of the march from the sidelines.

Who were these people who felt such hatred of their democratic governments
and such intense self-loathing?

There were the usual suspects: the remnants of the Left, from Stalinists and
Trotskyites to caviar socialists. There were the pro-abortionists, the
anti-GM food crowd, the anti-capital-punishment militants, the black-rights
gurus, the anti-Semites, the "burn Israel" lobby, the
"Bush-didn't-win-Florida" zealots, the unilateral disarmers, the
anti-Hollywood "cultural exception" merchants, and the guilt-ridden
postmodernist "everything is equal to everything else" philosophers.

But the bulk of the crowd consisted of fellow travelers, those innocent
citizens who, prompted by idealism or boredom, are always prepared to play
the role of "useful idiots," as Lenin used to call them.

They ignored the fact that the peoples of Iraq are unanimous in their
prayers for the war of liberation to come as quickly as possible.

The number of marchers did not impress Salima, the grandmother.

"What is wrong does not become right because many people say it," she
asserted, bidding us farewell while the marchers shouted "Not in my name!"

Let us hope that when Iraq is liberated, as it soon will be, the world will
remember that it was not done in the name of Rev. Jackson, Charles Kennedy,
Glenda Jackson, Tony Benn, and their companions in a march of shame.

- Amir Taheri is author of The Cauldron: The Middle East behind the
headlines. Taheri is reachable through www.benadorassociates.com.










----- Original Message -----
To: Bdnow
Sent: 28 February, 2003 11:10 PM
Subject: FW: [globalnews] A Triumphant Virtual March



A Triumphant Virtual March

Posted by Lakshmi on February 26, 2003 @  1:30PM
AlterNet
Over one million people from around the nation jammed the White House and Senate switchboards today to register their loud and unequivocal opposition to the war. Former Congressman Tom Andrews, National Director of Win Without War , said "Well over one million phone calls were made in just eight hours by people from every state in the country. Every Senator’s office and the White House switchboard received at least two and often more calls per minute. Many callers had to settle for busy signals."

The Virtual March on Washington was organized by Win Without War, a coalition of 32 organizations including the National Council of Churches, MoveOn.org, the NAACP, NOW, and the Sierra Club.

According to Andrews, the protest was designed to give the many who don't usually take place in marches a chance to let "their fingers do their marching." As part of the protest, folks emailed, faxed and phoned their Senators and the White House to express their support for U.N. inspections. Estimates for fax and email messages are not available as yet. But it is clear, in Andrews' words, the antiwar message "got through loud and clear today."
--
"The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances. If there is any reaction, both are transformed."
~Jung

Reply via email to