Dear glen, Thanks for your reply. I don't think that I will take this point further until I see your web page. Wont be able to get to it for a few days as I have a workshop on this weekend. Will resume discussion sometime next week. Go well James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: Re: Chromas and humus Was Electronic homeopathy for plants.
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Hedley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:21 PM > Subject: Re: Chromas and humus Was Electronic homeopathy for plants. > > > > Dear Lloyd, > > The idea that potentised preps "stay put" as proposed by Glen does not > agree > > with my understanding and use of radionically prepared substances. > > It would appear you are indentifying an essential difference between > Potentised and radionic preps - all the more reason to be clear in their > naming when discussing them. By their very nature of application I would > expect radionic preps to radiate. > re potentised preps radiation , please inspect the pictures on my website, > especially the Kale trials, where three plants, side by side, from the same > punnet have been sprayed differently with 3 different outcomes. When I first > began using pot. preps and spread them with a brush I had green strips > across the lawn, which did not even out. (This was done 12 years ago and > similiar results have occurred since) This was the first hint. I recently > did trials on coriander, very close together which have shown the same > effect. We also have on video -CD available- the results of some spring > spraying where there is a distinct line in the paddock between the sprayed > and unsprayed areas. One is dairy pasture the other is all off to seed. No > diffused area whatsover. > The results and pictures speak for themselves. What is your explanation if > you do not accept these pictures proposal? > > > > If radionic preps "stayed put" you would not be able to use a small > amount > > in your BC and expect it to permeate through the whole mix. It would just > be > > a few drops scattered amongst the compost. if there was not a radiational > > effect Glen would not be able to claim that his possum retardant can be > > mixed into sand and a handful thrown out every 20 metres or so. > > The story above is from Peter Bacchus who was spreading unpotentised possum > ash. Which no doubt has a radiation effect. > Over the last 10 months I have been spraying pot. possum preps , not > peppers, and it is obvious from the possum trails leading into and out of > the tree on the edge of the sprayed area, that traffic in is normal from two > directions - as seen in tracks thru long grass- however the track to the > house from the tree was difficult to see, hence little to no use. Sadly I > did not video this before the grass was eaten off. > > > Supposing that you were to dilute a litre of preps from Glen, in whatever > > amount of water that he suggests, if the homoeopathic preps had no > > radiational effect on the rest of the water why would you dilute it. Is > the > > water just a carrier or does something happen to the water. It seems to > me > > that the memory pattern from the potentised preps permeates the medium > > through osmosis. > > Yes the water is acting as a carrier of the potentised preps. It is mixing > with and being carried by, no doubt there is some combining into the memory > function of the water. Where it carries it to though, is were it stays. > Thus we suggest fine sprays over the area to be treated. > > with regards potentised weed peppers, many people make these and they are > sprayed around with a fine spray usually. Peter has a dairy farming client > who did Ragwort last year with some pretty amazing results. Maybe he can > tell us more about this with regards to seed germination? > regards > Glen A > >
