Alan now we are geting to something very ,very complicated . Here in Brasil we have a similar " aparatus as Tesla would call it " that isThe SIVAM ( Sistema de Vigilancia da Amazonia also runned by Raytheon ) witch is on da Equador line , from the Eletrical magnectic point of view streamly important . I find this Email bellow witch was traslated and I hope it help you all. Also Holes In Haven is the story of who built the Infraestructure and developted the project and to the Patent http://www.haarp.com/main.html by Dr. Bernad Eastlund. And rember the Russia has a smilar project called called WoodPaker.But rember we are talking about companies as Raytheon who developed and sell 80% of everthing that is in Golf war rigth now " Tomakalk missel " , infrared equipaments etc.
http://www.sivam.gov.br/( New )
http://www.raytheon.com/c3i/c3iproducts/c3isivam/ ( the
old one )
>HAARP: VANDALISM IN THE SKY?
>Published in Nexus
Magazine,
><http://www.nexusmagazine.com/backissues/301.conts.html>Volume
3,
>Number 1 (December '95-January '96)
>PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld
4560 Australia.
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Telephone:
+61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381
>From our web page at: <http://www.nexusmagazine.com>www.nexusmagazine.com
>
>Copyright:
1995 by Dr Nick Begich and Jeane Manning
>Earthpulse Press, PO Box 201393,
Anchorage, Alaska 99520, USA
>Voice Mail: 907 249
9111
>
>
>Technonet is the protest form of the 1990s-picketing
on the
>information highways. For example, a fast-growing assortment of
men
>and women around the world are using the Internet (started by the
US
>military for information transfer and exchange that would never
be
>interfered with) to draw attention to a questionable
military
>project in Alaska. Now these Internetting, e-mailing, faxing
folks
>are blowing holes in the US Department of Defense secrecy wall
by
>using the government's own system.
>The printed-word part of the
protest started when Dennis Specht, an
>anti-nuclear activist then living
in Alaska, sent a news item to
>NEXUS on the topic of HAARP-the
High-frequency Active Auroral
>Research Program. Then, an Alaskan
political activist and science
>researcher in Anchorage, Nick Begich,
networked with Patrick and
>Gael Crystal Flanagan, who are self-described
"technomonks" living
>in Sedona, Arizona, and was told to check out that
same
>Australian-based magazine. Begich was surprised to see an item
from
>his home town in NEXUS and immediately headed to the local
library
>to dig out the documents cited in the
article.
>
>That research led to articles and the book, Angels Don't
Play this
>HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, which is 230 pages of
detailed
>information on this intrusive project. This article will only
give
>highlights. Despite the amount of research (350 footnotes), at
its
>heart it is a story about ordinary people who took on
an
>extraordinary challenge.
>
>HAARP BOILS THE UPPER
ATMOSPHERE
>HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and
steerable
>electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an
'ionospheric
>heater'. (The ionosphere is the electrically-charged
sphere
>surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between about 40
to
>600 miles above Earth's surface.)
>
>Put simply,
the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio
>telescope: antennas send
out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is
>the test run for a
super-powerful radio wave beaming technology that
>lifts areas of the
ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those
>areas. Electromagnetic
waves then bounce back onto Earth and
>penetrate everything-living and
dead. HAARP publicity gives the
>impression that the High-frequency Active
Auroral Research Program
>is mainly an academic project with the goal of
changing the
>ionosphere to improve communications for our own good.
However,
>other US military documents put it more clearly: HAARP aims to
learn
>how to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense
purposes".
>Communicating with submarines is only one of those
purposes.
>
>Press releases and other information from the
military on HAARP
>continually downplay what it could do. Publicity
documents insist
>that the HAARP project is no different than other
ionospheric
>heaters operating safely throughout the world in places such
as
>Arecibo, Puerto Rico; Troms�, Norway; and the former Soviet
Union.
>However, a 1990 government document indicates that the
radio
>frequency (RF) power zap will drive the ionosphere to
unnatural
>activities:
>
>"...at the highest HF powers
available in the West, the
>instabilities commonly studied are approaching
their maximum RF
>energy dissipative capability, beyond which the plasma
processes
>will 'run away' until the next limiting factor is
reached."
>
>If the military, in cooperation with the University of
Alaska,
>Fairbanks, can show that this new ground-based "Star
Wars"
>technology is sound, they both win. The military has a
relatively
>inexpensive defence shield and the university can brag about
the
>most dramatic geophysical manipulation since atmospheric
explosions
>of nuclear bombs. After successful testing, they would have
the
>military megaprojects of the future and huge markets for
Alaska's
>North Slope natural gas.
>
>Looking at the other
patents which built on the work of a Texas
>physicist named Bernard
Eastlund, it becomes clearer how the
>military intends to use the HAARP
transmitter. It also makes
>governmental denials less believable. The
military knows how it
>intends to use this technology, and has made it
clear in their
>documents. The military has deliberately misled the public
through
>sophisticated word games, deceit and outright
disinformation.
>
>The military says the HAARP system
could:
>
>
>give the military a tool to replace the
electromagnetic pulse effect
>of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still
considered a viable
>option by the military through at least
1986);
>replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)
submarine
>communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a
new
>and more compact technology;
>be used to replace the
over-the-horizon radar system that was once
>planned for the current
location of HAARP, with a more flexible and
>accurate
system;
>provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely
large
>area, while keeping the military's own communications
systems
>working;
>provide a wide-area Earth-penetrating tomography
which, if combined
>with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray
computers, would make
>it possible to verify many parts of nuclear
nonproliferation and
>peace agreements;
>be a tool for geophysical
probing to find oil, gas and mineral
>deposits over a large
area;
>be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise
missiles,
>making other technologies obsolete.
>The above abilities
seem like a good idea to all who believe in
>sound national defence and to
those concerned about cost-cutting.
>However, the possible uses which the
HAARP records do not explain,
>and which can only be found in US Air
Force, Army, Navy and other
>federal agency records, are alarming.
Moreover, effects from the
>reckless use of these power levels in our
natural shield-the
>ionosphere-could be cataclysmic, according to some
scientists.
>
>Two Alaskans put it bluntly. A founder of the NO
HAARP movement,
>Clare Zickuhr, says: "The military is going to give the
ionosphere a
>big kick and see what happens."
>
>The military
failed to tell the public that they do not know what
>exactly will happen,
but a Penn State science article brags about
>that uncertainty. Macho
science? The HAARP project uses the largest
>energy levels yet played
with, by what Begich and Manning call "the
>big boys with their new toys".
It is an experiment on the sky, and
>experiments are done to find out
something not already known.
>Independent scientists told Begich and
Manning that a HAARP-type
>'skybuster' with its unforeseen effects could
be an act of global
>vandalism..
>
>HAARP HISTORY
>The
patents described below were the package of ideas which were
>originally
controlled by ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated
>(APTI), a subsidiary
of Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the
>biggest oil companies in the
world. APTI was the contractor that
>built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold
this subsidiary, the patents and
>the second phase construction contract
to E-Systems in June 1994.
>
>E-Systems is one of the biggest
intelligence contractors in the
>world, doing work for the CIA, defence
intelligence organisations
>and others. US$1.8 billion of their annual
sales are to these
>organisations, with $800 million for black
projects-projects so
>secret that even the United States Congress isn't
told how the money
>is being spent.
>
>E-Systems was bought
out by Raytheon which is one of the largest
>defence contractors in the
world. In 1994 Raytheon was listed as
>number 42 on the "Fortune 500" list
of companies. Raytheon has
>thousands of patents, some of which will be
valuable in the HAARP
>project. Twelve patents are the backbone of the
HAARP project, and
>are now buried among the thousands of others held in
the name of
>Raytheon.
>
>Bernard J. Eastlund's US Patent
#4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus
>for Altering a Region in the Earth's
Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or
>Magnetosphere", was sealed for a year under
a government secrecy
>order.
>
>The Eastlund ionospheric
heater was different: the radio frequency
>(RF) radiation was concentrated
and focused to a point in the
>ionosphere. This difference throws an
unprecedented amount of energy
>into the ionosphere. The Eastlund device
would allow a concentration
>of one watt per cubic centimetre, compared to
others only able to
>deliver about one millionth of one
watt.
>
>This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere
in the
>ways necessary to create futuristic effects described in the
patent.
>According to the patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early
1900s
>formed the basis of the research.
>
>What would this
technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the
>patents? They could make
enormous profits by beaming electrical
>power, without wires, from a
powerhouse in the gas fields to the
>consumer.
>
>For a time,
HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of
>the intended uses
for HAARP. In April 1995, however, Begich found
>other patents, connected
with a 'key personnel' list for APTI. Some
>of these new APTI patents were
indeed a wireless system for sending
>electrical
power.
>
>Eastlund's patent said the technology can confuse or
completely
>disrupt airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance
systems.
>Further, this ability to spray large areas of Earth
with
>electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies, and to control
changes
>in those waves, makes it possible to knock out communications
on
>land or sea as well as in the air. The patent
said:
>
>"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put
unprecedented
>amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic
locations
>and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if
random
>pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and
better
>controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior
art,
>particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields
at
>various altitudes...
>
>"...it is possible not only to
interfere with third party
>communications but to take advantage of one or
more such beams to
>carry out a communications network even though the
rest of the
>world's communications are disrupted. Put another way, what
is used
>to disrupt another's communications can be employed by
one
>knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at
the
>same time.
>
>"...large regions of the atmosphere could
be lifted to an
>unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter
unexpected and
>unplanned drag forces with resultant
destruction...
>
>"Weather modification is possible by, for example,
altering upper
>atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more
plumes of
>atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing
device.
>...molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so
that
>positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides
actually
>changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region,
a
>particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for
increased
>presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in
the
>atmosphere could be artificially increased..."
>
>Begich
found 11 other APTI patents. They told how to make
>"Nuclear-sized
Explosions without Radiation", power-beaming systems,
>over-the-horizon
radar, detection systems for missiles carrying
>nuclear warheads,
electromagnetic pulses previously produced by
>thermonuclear weapons and
other "Star Wars" tricks. This cluster of
>patents underlay the HAARP
weapon system.
>
>Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered
bizarre schemes.
>For example, US Air Force documents revealed that a
system had been
>developed for manipulating and disrupting human mental
processes
>through pulsed radio-frequency radiation (the stuff of HAARP)
over
>large geographical areas. The most telling material about
this
>technology came from writings of Zbigniew Brzezinski
(former
>National Security Adviser to US President Carter) and J.
F.
>MacDonald (science adviser to US President Johnson and a
Professor
>of Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote about use of
power-beaming
>transmitters for geophysical and environmental warfare.
The
>documents showed how these effects might be caused, and the
negative
>effects on human health and thinking.
>
>The
mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most
>disturbing. More
than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of
>footnotes, chronicle the work
of Harvard professors, military
>planners and scientists as they plan and
test this use of the
>electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the
papers
>describing this use was from the International Red Cross in
Geneva.
>It even gave the frequency ranges where these effects
could
>occur-the same ranges which HAARP is capable of
broadcasting.
>
>The following statement was made more than 25 years
ago in a book
>which Brzezinski wrote while a professor at Columbia
University:
>
>"Political strategists are tempted to exploit
research on the brain
>and human behaviour. Geophysicist Gordon J. F.
MacDonald-specialist
>in problems of warfare-says accurately-timed,
artificially-excited
>electronic strokes 'could lead to a pattern of
oscillations that
>produce relatively high power levels over certain
regions of the
>Earth... In this way, one could develop a system that
would
>seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations
in
>selected regions over an extended period...' No matter how
deeply
>disturbing the thought of using the environment to
manipulate
>behaviour for national advantages, to some the technology
permitting
>such use will very probably develop within the next few
decades."
>
>In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's
Science Advisory
>Committee and later a member of the President's Council
on
>Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use
of
>environmental control technologies for military purposes. The
most
>profound comment he made as a geophysicist was:
>
>"The
key to geophysical warfare is the identification of
>environmental
instabilities to which the addition of a small amount
>of energy would
release vastly greater amounts of energy."
>
>While yesterday's
geophysicists predicted today's advances, are
>HAARP program managers
delivering on the vision? The geophysicists
>recognised that adding energy
to the environmental soup could have
>large effects. However, humankind
has already added substantial
>amounts of electromagnetic energy into our
environment without
>understanding what might constitute critical mass.
The book by
>Begich and Manning raises questions. Have these additions
been
>without effect, or is there a cumulative amount beyond
which
>irreparable damage can be done? Is HAARP another step in a
journey
>from which we cannot turn back? Are we about to embark on
another
>energy experiment which unleashes another set of demons
from
>Pandora's box?
>
>As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski
predicted a "more controlled
>and directed society" would gradually
appear, linked to technology.
>This society would be dominated by an elite
group which impresses
>voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how.
Angels Don't Play
>This HAARP further quotes
Brzezinski:
>
>"Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal
values, this
>elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by
using the
>latest modern techniques for influencing public behaviour
and
>keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical
and
>scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it
exploits,"
>Brzezinski predicted.
>
>His forecasts proved
accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the
>"elite" are emerging, and
the temptation to use them increases
>steadily. The policies to permit the
tools to be used are already in
>place. How could the United States be
changed, bit by bit, into the
>predicted highly-controlled technosociety?
Among the 'stepping
>stones' Brzezinski expected were persisting social
crises and use of
>the mass media to gain the public's
confidence.
>
>In another document prepared by the government, the
US Air Force claims:
>
>"The potential applications of artificial
electromagnetic fields are
>wide-ranging and can be used in many military
or quasi-military
>situations.... Some of these potential uses include
dealing with
>terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of
security at
>military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in
tactical
>warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic)
systems
>would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption
or
>perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability
of
>individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that
they
>would be combat-ineffective. Another advantage of
electromagnetic
>systems is that they can provide coverage over large
areas with a
>single system. They are silent, and countermeasures to them
may be
>difficult to develop... One last area where
electromagnetic
>radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing
abilities of
>individuals for anomalous phenomena."
>
>Do
these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The
>author of
the government report refers to an earlier Air Force
>document about the
uses of radio-frequency radiation in combat
>situations. (Here, Begich and
Manning note that HAARP is the most
>versatile and the largest
radio-frequency radiation transmitter in
>the world.)
>
>The
United States congressional record deals with the use of HAARP
>for
penetrating the Earth with signals bounced off the ionosphere.
>These
signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many
>kilometres
in order to locate underground munitions, minerals and
>tunnels. For 1996
the US Senate has set aside US$15 million to
>develop this ability alone:
Earth-penetrating tomography. The
>problem is that the frequency needed
for Earth-penetrating
>radiations is within the frequency range most cited
for disruption
>of human mental functions. It may also have profound
effects on
>migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on
an
>undisturbed energy field to find their routes.
>
>As if
electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were
>not enough,
Eastlund bragged that the super-powerful ionospheric
>heater could control
weather. Begich and Manning brought to light
>government documents
indicating that the military has
>weather-control technology. When HAARP
is eventually built to its
>full power level, it could create weather
effects over entire
>hemispheres. If one government experiments with the
world's weather
>patterns, what is done in one place will impact everyone
else on the
>planet.. Angels Don't Play This HAARP explains a principle
behind
>some of Nikola Tesla's inventions-resonance-which affects
planetary
>systems.
>
>BUBBLE OF ELECTRIC
PARTICLES
>Angels Don't Play This HAARP includes interviews with
independent
>scientists such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has a Ph.D., a
long and
>impressive career in high-energy physics, and has been published
in
>prestigious science journals and books. Rauscher commented on
HAARP:
>"You're pumping tremendous energy into an extremely
delicate
>molecular configuration that comprises these multi-layers we
call
>the ionosphere." The ionosphere is prone to catalytic reactions,
she
>explained: if a small part is changed, a major change in
the
>ionosphere can happen.
>
>In describing the ionosphere as
a delicately balanced system, Dr
>Rauscher shared her mental picture of
it: a soap bubble-like sphere
>surrounding Earth's atmosphere, with
movements swirling over the
>surface of the bubble. If a big enough hole
is punched through it,
>she predicts it could
pop.
>
>SLICING THE IONOSPHERE
>Physicist Daniel
Winter, Ph.D., of Waynesville, North Carolina, says
>HAARP high-frequency
emissions can couple with long wave (low
>frequency or ELF) pulses the
Earth grid uses to distribute
>information as vibrations to synchronise
dances of life in the
>biosphere. Dan terms this geomagnetic action
"Earth's information
>bloodstream", and says it is likely that coupling of
HAARP HF (high
>frequency) with natural ELF (extremely low frequency) can
cause
>unplanned, unsuspected side-effects.
>
>David
Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background
>in
electronics. He described possible interactions of HAARP
>radiations with
the ionosphere and Earth's magnetic grid:
>
>"HAARP will not burn
'holes' in the ionosphere. That is a dangerous
>understatement of what
HAARP's giant gigawatt beam will do. Earth is
>spinning relative to thin
electric shells of the multilayer membrane
>of 'iono-spheres' that absorb
and shield Earth's surface from
>intense solar radiation, including
charged particle storms in solar
>winds erupting from the Sun. Earth's
axial spin means that HAARP-in
>a burst lasting more than a few
minutes-will slice through the
>ionosphere like a microwave knife. This
produces not a hole, but a
>long tear-an incision.
>
>CRUDELY
PLUCKING THE STRINGS
>"Second concept: As Earth rotates, HAARP will slice
across
>geomagnetic flux...a donut-shaped spool of magnetic
strings-like
>longitude meridians (on maps). HAARP may not 'cut' these
strings in
>Gaia's magnetic mantle, but will pulse each thread with
harsh,
>out-of-harmony high frequencies. These noisy impulses will
vibrate
>geomagnetic flux lines, sending vibrations all through
the
>geomagnetic web.
>
>"The image comes to mind of a
spider on its web. An insect lands,
>and the web's vibrations alert the
spider to possible prey. HAARP
>will be a manmade microwave finger poking
at the web, sending out
>confusing signals, if not tearing holes in the
threads.
>
>"Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia's
geomagnetic
>harp are unknown, and I suspect barely thought of. Even if
thought
>of, the intent [of HAARP] is to learn to exploit any effects, not
to
>play in tune to global symphonies."
>
>Among
other researchers quoted is Paul Schaefer of Kansas City. His
>degree is
in electrical engineering and he spent four years building
>nuclear
weapons. "But most of the theories that we have been taught
>by scientists
to believe in seem to be falling apart," he says. He
>talks about
imbalances already caused by the industrial and atomic
>age, especially by
radiation of large numbers of tiny, high-velocity
>particles "like very
small spinning tops" into our environment. The
>unnatural level of motion
of highly energetic particles in the
>atmosphere and in radiation belts
surrounding Earth is the villain
>in the weather disruptions, according to
this model which describes
>an Earth discharging its buildup of heat,
relieving stress and
>regaining a balanced condition through earthquakes
and volcanic
>action.
>
>FEVERISH EARTH
>"One might
compare the abnormal energetic state of the Earth and its
>atmosphere to a
car battery which has become overcharged with the
>normal flow of energy
jammed up, resulting in hot spots, electrical
>arcing, physical cracks and
general turbulence as the pent-up energy
>tries to find some place to
go."
>
>In a second analogy, Schaefer says:
>
>"Unless
we desire the death of our planet, we must end the
>production of unstable
particles which are generating the Earth's
>fever. A first priority to
prevent this disaster would be to shut
>down all nuclear power plants and
end the testing of atomic weapons,
>electronic warfare and 'Star
Wars'."
>
>Meanwhile, the military builds its biggest ionospheric
heater yet,
>to deliberately create more instabilities in a huge plasma
layer-the
>ionosphere-and to rev up the energy level of charged
particles.
>
>ELECTRONIC RAIN FROM THE SKY
>The military has
published papers about electron precipitation from
>the magnetosphere (the
outer belts of charged particles which stream
>toward Earth's magnetic
poles) caused by manmade very-low-frequency
>electromagnetic
waves:
>
>"These precipitated particles can produce secondary
ionisation, emit
>X-rays, and cause significant perturbation in the lower
ionosphere."
>
>Two Stanford University radio scientists offer
evidence of what
>technology can do to affect the sky by making waves on
Earth. They
>showed that very low frequency radio waves can vibrate
the
>magnetosphere and cause high-energy particles to cascade into
the
>Earth's atmosphere. By turning the signal on or off, they could
stop
>the flow of energetic particles.
>
>WEATHER
CONTROL
>Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit
us
>hard. Their work suggests that technicians could control
global
>weather by sending relatively small 'signals' into the Van
Allen
>belts (radiation belts around Earth). Thus Tesla's resonance
effects
>can control enormous energies by tiny triggering
signals.
>
>The Begich/Manning book asks whether that knowledge will
be used by
>war-oriented or biosphere-oriented
scientists.
>
>The military has had about 20 years to work on
weather warfare
>methods, which it euphemistically calls weather
modification. For
>example, rainmaking technology was taken for a few test
rides in
>Vietnam. The US Department of Defense sampled lightning
and
>hurricane manipulation studies in Project Skyfire and
Project
>Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated technologies
that
>would give big effects. Angels Don't Play This HAARP cites an
expert
>who says the military studied both lasers and chemicals which
they
>figured could damage the ozone layer over an enemy. Looking at
ways
>to cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them, was part of
the
>project named Prime Argus, decades ago. The money for that came
from
>the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA, now under
the
>acronym ARPA).
>
>In 1994 the US Air Force
revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan
>which includes weather control.
Scientists have experimented with
>weather control since the 1940s, but
Spacecast 2020 noted that
>"using environmental modification techniques to
destroy, damage or
>injure another state [is] prohibited". Having said
that, the Air
>Force claimed that advances in technology "compels a
re-examination
>of this sensitive and potentially risky
topic".
>
>FORTY YEARS OF ZAPPING THE SKY?
>As far back as
1958, the chief White House adviser on weather
>modification, Captain
Howard T. Orville, said the US defence
>department was studying "ways to
manipulate the charges of the Earth
>and sky and so affect the weather by
using an electronic beam to
>ionise or de-ionise the atmosphere over a
given area.
>
>In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald was
Associate Director of
>the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics
at the University
>of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the
President's Science
>Advisory Committee, and later a member of the
President's Council on
>Environmental Quality. He published papers on the
use of
>environmental control technologies for military purposes.
MacDonald
>made a revealing comment:
>
>"The key to
geophysical warfare is the identification of
>environmental instabilities
to which the addition of a small amount
>of energy would release vastly
greater amounts of energy."
>
>World-recognised scientist MacDonald
had a number of ideas for using
>the environment as a weapon system and he
contributed to what was,
>at the time, the dream of a futurist. When he
wrote his chapter,
>"How to Wreck the Environment", for the book Unless
Peace Comes, he
>was not kidding around. In it he describes the use of
weather
>manipulation, climate modification, polar ice-cap melting
or
>destabilisation, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake
engineering,
>ocean wave control and brainwave manipulation using the
planet's
>energy fields. He also said that these types of weapons would
be
>developed and, when used, would be virtually undetectable by
their
>victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The military's intention to
do
>environmental engineering is well-documented.
>
>US
Congress's subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International
>Environment
looked into military weather and climate modification
>conducted in the
early 1970s. "What emerged was an awesome picture
>of far-ranging research
and experimentation by the Department of
>Defense into ways environmental
tampering could be used as a
>weapon," said another author cited in Angels
Don't Play This HAARP.
>
>The revealed secrets surprised
legislators. Would an inquiry into
>the state of the art of
electromagnetic manipulation surprise
>lawmakers today? They may find out
that technologies developed out
>of the HAARP experiments in Alaska could
deliver on Gordon
>MacDonald's vision, because leading-edge scientists are
describing
>global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems
but also
>as an electrical system.
>
>SMALL INPUT, BIG
EFFECT
>HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A
point
>to remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical
shield
>protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of
high-energy
>particles from space. This conducting plasma, along with
Earth's
>magnetic field, traps the electrical plasma of space and holds
it
>back from going directly to the Earth's surface, says Charles
Yost
>of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina:
>
>"If
the ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is
>subsequently
disturbed."
>
>Another scientist interviewed said there is a
super-powerful
>electrical connection between the ionosphere and the part
of the
>atmosphere where our weather comes onstage: the lower
atmosphere.
>
>One manmade electrical effect-power-line harmonic
resonance-causes
>fallout of charged particles from the Van Allen
(radiation) belts,
>and the falling ions cause ice crystals (which
precipitate rain
>clouds).
>
>What about HAARP? Energy blasted
upward from an ionospheric heater
>is not much compared to the total in
the ionosphere, but HAARP
>documents admit that thousandfold greater
amounts of energy can be
>released in the ionosphere than injected. As
with MacDonald's "key
>to geophysical warfare", "nonlinear" effects
(described in the
>literature about the ionospheric heater) mean small
input and large
>output.
>
>Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told
Manning that an acupuncture model
>is one way to look at the possible
effect of multi-gigawatt pulsing
>of the ionosphere. If HAARP hits certain
points, those parts of the
>ionosphere could react in surprising
ways.
>
>Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo
are
>underneath relatively placid regions of the ionosphere compared
to
>the dynamic movements nearer Earth's magnetic poles. That
adds
>another uncertainty to HAARP: the unpredictable and lively
upper
>atmosphere near the North Pole.
>
>HAARP experimenters
do not impress common-sense Alaskans such as
>Barbara Zickuhr, who says:
"They're like boys playing with a sharp
>stick, finding a sleeping bear
and poking it in the butt to see
>what's going to
happen."
>
>COULD THEY SHORT-CIRCUIT THE EARTH?
>Earth as a
spherical electrical system is a fairly well-accepted
>model. However,
those experimenters who want to make unnatural power
>connections between
parts of this system might not be thinking of
>possible consequences.
Electrical motors and generators can be
>caused to wobble when their
circuits are affected. Could human
>activities cause a significant change
in a planet's electrical
>circuit or electrical field? A paper in the
respected journal
>Science deals with manmade ionisation from radioactive
material, but
>perhaps it could also be studied with HAARP-type skybusters
in mind:
>
>"For example, while changes in the Earth's electric
field resulting
>from a solar flare modulating conductivity may have only
a barely
>detectable effect on meteorology, the situation may be different
in
>regard to electric field changes caused by manmade
ionisation..."
>
>Meteorology, of course, is the study of the
atmosphere and weather.
>Ionisation is what happens when a higher level of
power is zapped
>into atoms and knocks electrons off the atoms. The
resulting charged
>particles are the stuff of HAARP. "One look at the
weather should
>tell us that we are on the wrong path," says Paul
Schaefer,
>commenting on HAARP-type technologies.
>
>Angels
Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology is about
>the
military's plan to manipulate that which belongs to the world:
>the
ionosphere. The arrogance of the United States Government in
>this is not
without precedent. Atmospheric nuclear tests had similar
>goals. More
recently, China and France put their people's money to
>destructive use in
underground nuclear tests. It was recently
>reported that the US
Government spent US$3 trillion on its nuclear
>program since its
beginnings in the 1940s. What new breakthroughs in
>life science could
have been made with all the money spent on death?
>
>Begich,
Manning, Roderick and others believe that democracies need
>to be founded
on openness rather than the secrecy which surrounds so
>much military
science. Knowledge used in developing revolutionary
>weapons could be used
for healing and helping mankind. Because they
>are used in new weapons,
discoveries are classified and suppressed.
>When they do appear in the
work of other independent scientists, the
>new ideas are often frustrated
or ridiculed, while military research
>laboratories continue to build
their new machines for the killing
>fields.
>
>However, the
book by Manning and Begich gives hope that
the
>military-industrial-academic-bureaucratic Goliath can be affected
by
>the combined power of determined individuals and the
alternative
>press. Becoming informed is the first step to
empowerment.
>
>The book, Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in
Tesla
>Technology, is available for USD$14.95 plus postage and
handling
>(USD$1.50; USD$4.00 international) from Earthpulse Press, c/o
Dr
>Nick Begich, PO Box 201393, Anchorage, Alaska 99520, USA. It
can
>also be ordered by Visa/MasterCard by phoning +1 (907) 249 9111.
ALSO
US technology capable of manipulating the Ion Ratios to change human behavior.
By Guy Cramer
Before the events of September 11, 2001, the thought of American Military being
given the authority to shoot down American civilian airliners loaded with
passengers over U.S. territory was inconceivable. Now this and many other
measures are necessary for the safety and security of the nation.
Continues at: http://www.superforce.com/email-releases/HAARP.htm
Tonight on Area M4 @ 10 PM EST on http://www.m4radio.com
Nov 13th 2002
Guest - Dr. Nicholas J. Begich
Subject - New technologies, health and earth science related issues
Book - Earth Rising: The Revolution, Toward a Thousand Years of Peace
Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology
Site http://www.earthpulse.com http://w3.nrl.navy.mil/haarp.html
Area M4 is a 4 hour talk radio show devoted to delving in to the
depths of the unknown, the strange, and the paranormal, in a
independent , unbiased, open minded, sometimes silly forum with
special guests and authors. Area M4 is broadcast every Wednesday
night from 10 PM till 2 am. Message us your stories or quest
